This question has to do with debating.I went to a debate at a University. A defense lawyer argued for the legalization of some illegal drugs. The defense lawyer stands to loose clients if drugs are legalized. So, she was arguing against her own self-interest. On the other side, a law enforcement agent argued against legalizing drugs. But, obviously, it would be against his best interest if drugs were legalized. So, was his argument tainted by his self-interest in preserving the drug enforcement industry? I have read some Police Chiefs and even Police Officers argue for legalization. To me that is a very compelling argument. Is there anyone in this forum, who is a law enforcement officer, who would argue for legalization? Either way, why or why not? In debates, in general, does arguing against your own self-interest make the argument more compelling than taking a position that favors your own self-interest?
2006-08-26
12:45:36
·
11 answers
·
asked by
5375
4