Law & Ethics - October 2006

2006-10-29 22:40:26 · 9 answers · asked by Maya 1

In the age of femi-nazism disguised as women's equality women tend to write their own laws but this one seems to go over the top. I know a man in jail for felony non-support in missouri as a result of impregnating a woman when SHE raped HIM. At what point are the women gonna stop pouting about the injustices of centuries past and start seeking equality instead of superiority? Is this not an indication of Femi-nazism going over the top?

2006-10-29 22:25:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I heard that in New York State, someone can be legally considered 18 (or any age of that matter) the day before his or her birthday...is this correct?

2006-10-29 22:10:49 · 5 answers · asked by ibrakeforchucknorris 1

How can a judge of the court of appeal reform the law??

2006-10-29 21:46:39 · 4 answers · asked by tward1989 2

Should it be removed from criminal codes?

2006-10-29 21:41:51 · 11 answers · asked by - 3

2006-10-29 21:12:30 · 5 answers · asked by nabcde a 1

IN THE YEAR 2000,I WAS ARRESTED FOR SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT MINE (DRUGS).I WAS WITH MY SPONSER THAT NIGHT GOING TO A NA MEETING.MY CASE I WON.YOU SEE I WAS WRONGFULLY INCARCERATED.SO WHILE IN JAIL I HAD TAKE THIS CASE TO TRIAL I DID AND WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY OF POSSESION OF ROCK COCAINE.MY CASE HAS WON.NOW MY ATTORNEY HAS NOT KEPT IN CONTACT WITH ME AND I CALL HIM AT HIS OFFICE.BUT HE NEVER GETS THE PHONE,HIS SECRETARY DOES.I LEAVE A MESSAGE BUT GET NO RETURNED CALLS. FOR SIX YEARS NOW I'VE BEEN DOING THIS. CAN SOMBODY PLEASE HELP CAUSE I DONT KNOW IF I WON THE CASE OR NOT.I HAVE NOT SPOKE TO MY ATTORNEY IN ABOUT 3YRS. THIS IS A CIVAL SUIT CASE 2000--2006 WHAT KIND OF ACTION CAN I DO TO FIND OUT HOW WERE DOING ON THE CASE....I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE PLEASE HELP....SIGHNED LOST

2006-10-29 20:21:38 · 4 answers · asked by MICKSTER 1

2006-10-29 20:18:22 · 11 answers · asked by cereal killer 5

I cannot afford a lawyer, I want to read a letter to Judge, I pleaded no Contest but I think I was railroaded in to saying No Contest. I half to go to court for sentencing.

2006-10-29 20:15:20 · 5 answers · asked by MARCIA S 2

Twenty students living in Little Rock, Arkansas were suspended from school on Friday October 6th after silently protesting the school districts restrictive uniform policy by wearing black armbands to school. After the school district found out about the black armbands they violated the students rights of freedom of speech by disciplining and/or suspending about 30 students. What is it with our country that many incidents like this are happening all over? Not only are teachers and school districts doing it but law enforcement officers as well. One case dealt with a man and his sister being arrested while protesting at a rally in western Pennsylvania all because he carried a sign that read “The Bush family must surely love the poor – they made so many of us.” Another was a woman was asked to take down her political lawn signs because it violated a “Borough ban on political signs” and it would have to be taken down. These are officals who run our cities, towns, states and country.

2006-10-29 19:42:56 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-29 19:38:24 · 12 answers · asked by Canswer 1

i need that the subject will be related to law specially public policy mdecision making and so on

hellllp please

2006-10-29 19:35:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-29 19:24:22 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

standing in the community or financial status it would seem that they have been able to get backing when taken to court for not stopping certain mispractices in their institutions and have gotten off through some loophole.this happened to one director of an orphanage where i was a volunteer.he was and still is a crook in my opinion.

2006-10-29 19:17:56 · 1 answers · asked by stefan 3

I keep hearing that someone is starting these fires cuz they are mad cuz police refuse to ticket cars with no front license plate and so they are taking out their frustration by starting fires, has anyone else heard this, we heard people talking about it in a restaurant

2006-10-29 18:45:01 · 4 answers · asked by WannaKnow 2

2006-10-29 18:09:38 · 3 answers · asked by naru 1

His best friend, the victim, was mentally impaired and had accidentally killed a woman without intent; in fear, the victim ran away. The defendant discovers the dead woman and realises what his friend had done so goes out looking for him while the woman's husband and husband's friends begin a manhunt for the victim. The defendant gets to the victim first and shoots the victim in the back of the head to prevent the "mob" from doing worse or sending his mentally impaired friend to jail. When the mob discovers the defendant with the victim's body, they ask whether he killed the victim and he said that he did but got the gun from the victim implying self-defence (but he had the gun the whole time, though no one witnessed it). This is the defendant's first offence.
In Australia you need a guilty act, guilty mind and the combination of both to prove a murder. How do you prove guilty mind if the defence claims the the defendant was "out of it" when he shot his friend????

2006-10-29 18:05:38 · 8 answers · asked by ed-dg 2

what is contract law

2006-10-29 17:59:10 · 7 answers · asked by vangala v 1

2006-10-29 17:23:14 · 7 answers · asked by kaushiki 1

A county in MS has a jail without a doctor or nurse to give the inmates there medications. The sheriff has asked the supervisors for a doctor or RN to administer there medication but was refused. Is this against the law? And if so where can I find this law?

2006-10-29 17:17:49 · 7 answers · asked by jreb 1

Does anyone know codes or statutes on this

2006-10-29 17:16:33 · 2 answers · asked by azure1954_2005 1

Nazi Germany gave the right to its SS men to kill and torture. Nazi Germany was a sovereign nation with its own laws. A crime only exist if a nation makes it a crime.

2006-10-29 17:14:39 · 12 answers · asked by ? 6

Cuz if it aint...i'm breaking the law baddddddd!!

2006-10-29 17:08:29 · 8 answers · asked by Ry L 1

id like some ideas and thoughts from you guys...ok my opinion is this...i mean i can go into detail but the jist is this:this act allows our president and his officials to draw the line on what is and is NOT considered torture, correct? so basically he has altered our constitution and freed himself and others from ever being accused of a war crime(most crimes), right? NOw im all for our safety and prevention of terrorism BUT is this just a foor-in-the-door for Bush and his officials to twist and turn laws when HE feels they need to be changed?? it scares me only because i havent seen much in the way of progress in this war...not much has changed over in the mid-east, right?(as far as their own state of progress),right? so whats the deal with changing VERY important laws and rights of people? and civilians? is it going to be OKAY to kill a prisoners wife or kids to get him to talk? and if so, what is next for the USA?? pleez enlighten me i NEED IT!! lol =0)

2006-10-29 16:40:29 · 7 answers · asked by thatgirluknow 3

i'm look for the news in tennessee humboldt so can you help

2006-10-29 16:28:20 · 1 answers · asked by tims_belinda 1

2006-10-29 16:24:59 · 6 answers · asked by erin a 1

2006-10-29 16:14:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Like what happened to the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Say you worked for the government as a astronomer. Only you and some select government officials know this information. Would you go public with it? Some would argue it would plunge the world into utter violence and chaos.

Also, do you think it would be wise to conceal it from the public at large for the sake of order?

2006-10-29 16:08:10 · 8 answers · asked by college_republicans_club 2

I am writing a paper, it is a classical arguement and i have to find some info on the rights of sex offenders. I also want to make a point on what measures should be taken to distinguish them in society.

2006-10-29 15:40:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-29 15:35:48 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous