I was watching this story on the news the other day about this pedophile who has a website on which he posts pictures of very young girls. They aren't naked, but it's obvious the pictures are there for one reason and one reason only: to aid the site's pedo viewers with their fantasies.
You would think the guy should have been arrested a long time ago, as he's publically admitted to having a fascination with little girls... but.... since he hasn't actually committed an illegal act (other than violating a temporary restraining order), the law cannot prosocute him.
My question to you is this: Should the government actively censor and take down these sort of sites, although they have a First Amendment right to exist? Or do you support the pedophile's right to free speech because it is guarded by the Constitution? It's obvious that by removing such sites may help diminish the chance of victimization of children. What are your thoughts?
2007-08-17
04:05:02
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics