Since everyone (by everyone I mean 3000 top scientists in the world, all major atmospheric scientists, George Bush, 86 Evangelical leaders, NASA, and everyone with the training to evaluate the science) accepts that the evidence clearly supports both that global warming is happening and that it is caused by humans; we need to start debating actually what we should commit most of our funds. Should we manage the problem? Sea walls, expanded programs to those displaced by global warming, etc. Or should we attempt to stop the problem? Cuts in CO2 and other greenhouse gasses.
We have limited resources, and although it is not a choice where we can only choose one, we should pick one to focus most of our energies on.
www.ipcc.ch
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=11107
http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/global_warming_worldbook.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5194527
2007-08-17
07:59:13
·
4 answers
·
asked by
C.S.
5
in
Government