English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-17 07:23:26 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

Yes. It really all did hang on that infamous felons list.

Really truly, despite all the evasions and machination.

It was a stolen election.

2007-08-17 07:28:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 9

Yes, journalist Greg Palast uncovered the documents that proved that the Florida Republican Party ran the Elections Commission and removed African Americans from voter rolls who typically vote Democrat.

CONS, Here are the FACTS:
57,700 scrubbed from voter rolls.
Over 90% incorrect.
Of which over 90% vote Democrat.
Which leaves 46,000 Democrat voters illegally removed from voter rolls.
The last count of the election left Bush in the lead by 357!

Your clown prince lost the election but had his brother rig it in his state.

2007-08-17 08:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 1 1

Gore certainly did his best to rig it. First they tried to toss all the absentee ballots from military personnel. Then they tried to hold no less than 4 recounts, when the law clearly says 2 and no more, after a certain time the results have to be certified. Then the overwhelmingly Democrat Florida Supreme Court had to get their knuckles rapped by the US Supreme Court for blatantly ignoring legal precedents.
And after all was said and done and after about the 4th recount (unofficial) Bush still won. Close, but he won

2007-08-17 07:38:36 · answer #3 · answered by hironymus 7 · 2 1

No evidence exists to suggest that it was. The polling process in several states was flawed, and, for the first time in a long time, the vote in those states was close enough that the flaws actually mattered.

What was unique about the 2000 election was that it went to the courts. No other close election, or election with dubious voting practices, has seen such a resort by Presidential candidates. Even Nixon - one America's most maligned presidents - in his loss to Kennedy involving possible misconduct at the polls, did not resort to challenging the election in court.

2007-08-17 07:28:53 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 6 2

Still crying about the 2000 election??? Look dude, if Gore wins his home state of tennessee then he would have won. Since his own HOME state know what kind of man he really is, shouldn't that tell you something??? Reagan gave Mondale in 84 the worst beat down in presidential election history by winning 49 out of 50 states. The only state Mondale won was his home state of Minnesota at least his own people liked him and respected him, Gore's people turned there back on him because they knew first hand what a weak, phony he really is, so cry me a river, Al Gore what a joke, you truly do want the terrorists to kick our A@@ and dictate policy to the U.S.

2007-08-17 07:34:08 · answer #5 · answered by dez604 5 · 4 3

I don't think so. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I KNOW that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK, and that he is a robot manufactured in Cuba and but together in Dallas by the Texas Mafia. I think Bush won by Brain washing every one with McDonalds and Pepsi.

2007-08-17 07:36:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Recent BS:

Florida presidential election (2000)

Saudis flying planes into NYC skyscrapers (2001)

Iraq invasion (2003)

Oil and defense industry profits on the rise (2003-present)

2007-08-17 07:38:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

No. There is no proof whatsoever that it was rigged. That conspiracy theory is basically being kept alive by libs that hate Bush and are incapable of believing that he could every beat them fairly. It is ancient history, let it go, just like the Republicans have let go of the fact that JFK rigged the 1960 election to beat Richard Nixon.

2007-08-17 07:33:36 · answer #8 · answered by The Oracle of Delphi 6 · 3 4

Fair and Balanced-

You mean like when all those dead people in Chicago who voted for John F. Kennedy in 1960, another unproven voter fraud case that many on the left count as a lie.

2007-08-17 07:34:35 · answer #9 · answered by Greg 7 · 2 2

I'm sure there was plenty of the usual inner city bogus/multiple voter fraud scams that the Democrats pull off every election in virtually every major city, but it didn't have the desired effect in 2000.

2007-08-17 07:33:01 · answer #10 · answered by heavysarcasm 4 · 3 3

So you get on cons for talking about Clinton, but you libs still bring up a seven year old election! ROTFLOL!!!

I guess something good did come out of the election of George Walker Bush, you libs are still tearing your hair out of your scalp because he was elected over those two clueless goons you had representing you in 00 and 04

2007-08-17 07:27:58 · answer #11 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers