I just posted a question regarding the case in Georgia where two teens had sex. A sex tape was produced and entered into evidence. As it was entered into evidence, the prosecutor decided to distribute the tape to the public. While he was essentially following the law, it seems beyond the realm of common sense that a prosecutor would willingly distribute what is basically a child sex tape. I got quite a response with a person telling me to stop criticizing people for following a law that they did not write. So, I gave it some thought. And, still think that a person should always error on the side of caution where children are concerned. Perhaps this person shouldn't be drug out of office (but I certainly wouldn't be first in line to reelect this dude). If he doesn't have the "guts" to stand up to a law that allows him to release a child sex tape, what other injustices provided by law is he willing to overlook.
2007-07-13
11:29:52
·
3 answers
·
asked by
chicago3200000
3
in
Law & Ethics