Here’s the scenario. Childless couple Arthur and Martha Doofus have both written wills. Arthur’s stipulates that if he dies before Martha, then his money goes to her, but if she dies first, his money goes to the Dog Society. Martha’s will says that if she dies first, then her money goes to him, but if he dies first, then the Cat Society benefits.
Tragically, they have a car accident, and both die, apparently instantly. Who gets the money – the Cat or the Dog Society? Now, what about if they linger on for a couple of days? Imagine that one dies two days later, and 5 minutes later the other dies. Would this sort of thing affect the dispersal of the funds. What about if the Dog Society gets wind of this and argues for the doctors not to pull the plug until they have pulled the plug on his wife, so that the money goes to the Dog Society and not the Cat. If the Cat Society got in on the act, then there could be a Mexican standoff, with both sides keeping the respirators going. And so on.
2007-03-13
17:28:21
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Law & Ethics