Why is no one questioning this when these same people were saying that Bush was unfit to lead our country because he ONLY served in the National Guard?
2007-03-13 17:35:51 · 15 answers · asked by saq428 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Because both of them are professional hypocrites, and their supporters (which includes the media) are a bunch of brain-dead sheep.
As a Texan who once supported Dubya.... Bertacus I totally agree with you.
2007-03-13 17:40:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It is not a requirement to be president to serve in the military. People are saying that he went National Guard as to avoid the Draft, that is the difference, Hilary never avoided a draft, she never was put into that situation, nor was Obama. President Bush would be considered a Draft Dodger, versus just not having served.
2007-03-13 19:35:17 · answer #2 · answered by Hawaiisweetie 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush was " Hiding" out in the National Guard. Daddy arranged that for him, no doubt. He was there cheer leading while others were dying in Viet nam.. there was a war going on.
There was no war when Hillary or Obama were that age. Besides there is nothing wrong with not serving and saying you don't believe in the war.. but there is something wrong with a president who dons a uniform at the drop of a heat and pretends he actually did something during the war. He was protected because he was rich...
2007-03-13 17:44:43 · answer #3 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
for sure they are going to. that's what a spin Dr. does. Makes someone eye-catching. in spite of in the journey that they are one hundred and eighty levels out of section with the finest individual the Dr. made eye-catching. i wish to work out defense force service on a applicants resume yet even if that's absent it would not make for an computerized NO vote. the in undemanding words time Reagan wore a uniform replaced into in a movie. the guy who performed Capt. Kangaroo replaced into adorned for his movements on the sea coast at Normandy. Lee Marvin called him, "the bravest guy I ever said". and that's advisable to understand why Mr. Rogers always wore lengthy sleeves. defense force service shows me that someone can adapt and conquer hindrances. It does no longer recommend it truly is the in undemanding words thanks to study. BTW, i'm Retired defense force and so conservative I make Rush Limbaugh look like a bleeding heart. i guess i'm basically feeling gracious at present.
2016-12-01 23:28:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose your right G.W.Bush was in National Guard and is sending National Guardsmen into battle, But what of Hillary and Obama= what NO military back ground, Is Obama old enough to be president or is it because he's colored.
2007-03-13 17:45:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well...there was no draft for women when Hillary was of age to serve, as there was for Bush and Cheney.
Obama is not a neo con warhawk like cheney and bush.
It has to do with hippocracy of policy, not weather or not they served.
2007-03-13 17:39:57 · answer #6 · answered by Doug C 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush went to flying school supported by the military to the tune of $100,000 and then refused a physical because if he passed it he might have to fly in combat:(
2007-03-13 17:41:50 · answer #7 · answered by Nort 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is a woman and obama was too young to get drafted, why won't republicans answer why Bush is letting Illegals in and letting mexican truck drivers steal American jobs, answer me you coward!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-13 17:42:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
GOOD POINT, I wouldn't vote for either of them either.
So no more assaults on Kerry or Gores Service?
2007-03-13 17:47:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush now in retrospect was clearly unfit to lead. I dont think its military service thats key to success in that job.
2007-03-13 17:38:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋