What justifies the energy spent to rush around to "debunk" people who are assumed "nuts" with silly theories of no real consequence?
2007-03-13 17:22:37 · 19 answers · asked by mikeygonebad07 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The question asked above is for the paid shills.....how y'all doing tonight?
2007-03-13 17:36:18 · update #1
I don't understand the thrust of your question, but will try to answer it.
There is no real need to debunk any theory about 9/11, but it is helpful to point out that the attacks have been investigated and we pretty much know what happened and why.
If we value truth we want these harebrained "theories" debunked. At best these are speculative and at worst they are slanderous.
2007-03-13 17:27:26 · answer #1 · answered by Warren D 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is no debunking as many things that have been promulgated in the theories are not pop-science, they are fact!
So we are nuts! Well you fit a 757-200, 100 ton, 1'2 football field long aircraft in the little hole in the Pentagon!? Is that threading the neddle?
I have never said there is a conspiracy! I guess what I would like to know is how so many people dismiss things that we do know. And pretend nothing else exists!
We know a terrorist attack on the US was suggested by a top General! Pres Kennedy fired him!
We know that the CIA has conducted terrorist attacks in many parts of the world! Do you think they hold us sacred?
We know 9/11 and terrorist were not in Iraq!
We know that many of those said to be on the aircraft who hijacked them are alive and well! Considering they flew into a rather large building, I find that almost miracle like!
We know the FBI seized all the tapes from the pentagon and have yet, 5 1/2 years later, able to provide 1 photograph of a 757. It is 1/2 football field long! Pretty hard to miss!
We know that their are millions of top secret documents! Where are they and why are they being hidden? 9/11 happened over 5 years ago. It has nothing to do with National Security, a pat answer by any government official!
Those buildings were made like no other to withstand fire and a hit from an aircraft! They fell in less that 1 1/2 hours!
I don't know what happened on 9/11, but I do know the government is not being honest. They are never honest!
9/11 was convenient for Iraq as Bush had been discussing attacking them before 9/11!
When a government lies to a people, there are real consequences (ask those who served in Vietnam about the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution)! You wouldn't consider 58,229 dead military a "real consequence"? What are they? NOTHING!
I assume people like you are the real nuts as you have a pat theory and there is absolutely nothing they find that you even question! I find that to be beyond the Twilight Zone! What would your opinion be if it were Clinton in the White House? Ah, different story I bet!
It amazes me that you don't care about the truth. You don't know the truth, and there isn't a person on this board that knows the truth! There is nothing wrong with trying to seek it rather than buy anything you are fed by an administration that does nothing but lie!
2007-03-14 00:51:45 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no rush. Much of it has been suspected for 6 years. There are books on the subject that are well documented. So with the research necessary to write a book I hardly think anyone is rushing to debunk the original report. Maybe some are eager to attack those who have done the research and found some things that are not complimentary to the Administration. But they have had plenty of time and there is still some doubt about the official line.
2007-03-14 00:34:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think there is a rush in that direction. I think there is a rush in the other direction to discredit the "official" story of the 9/11 events when there is no real good reason why.
I guess the bigger question is why question the "official" designations? Oh wait, because its an anti-bush move thats why.
2007-03-14 00:26:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what you are referring to. That it was ordered by the U.S. government? Or that the U.S. govt knew it was going to happen & they just let it happen? Is this what you are talking about as the "official one"? Please be more specific. I've read many theories. From actors, celebrities, my friends, neighbors, websites, TIME magazines, etc. What do you consider to be the 'real' reason 9/11 happened?
2007-03-14 00:29:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know how we can have people who do not believe the current "theory". We have pictures of the hijackers getting on the aircraft, radio broadcasts from them over the aircraft radios, and cell phone calls from people who were on the aircraft. I would severely doubt there was a conspiracy, or any other events which transpired that day other than what is obvious.
2007-03-14 00:27:45 · answer #6 · answered by av8r_jim84 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, repeated posting of the same tired old CT links over and over again isn't really going to sell anyone. It's just annoying. Call it "self-debunking" by a CT. The more spam and repeated posts that show up, the less likely it is that anything is believable.
2007-03-14 00:42:35 · answer #7 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because,the same people who question 9/11 ,accepted Clinton's explanations for the attacks through out the 90's.
2007-03-14 00:28:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
no rush whatsoever!! I am happy with the official one anyway. Poor american construction practices (basically the same reason we all buy Japanese cars) created a very fragile building that evaporated with little provocation.
2007-03-14 00:24:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cause your theories make no sense. You might as well blame 9/11 on aliens and global warming.
2007-03-14 00:30:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋