Politics & Government - 29 September 2006

This will be long but please read on because this is very, very important. Could Conservatives be correct when they say that George Bush has a globalist agenda? Or are Conservatives spreading this Bush’s New World Order agenda theory for no good reason? Are the conservative claims that Bush is opening up our borders allowing Immigration from Mexico true? They say that America will be eliminated. They say the American dollar is to be switched to the N.A.U dollar, and N.A.U laws will over ride American laws. Conservatives claim that Bush’s open border policy will allow terrorists free reign in America, thus proving that Bush’s record on terror is the worst in American history. They claim that the next terror attack will be Bush’s fault.

Conservatives say that “Bush’s North American Union” was designed by Bush to eliminate American jobs, and have them handed over to Mexico. Conservative Republicans claim that Bush’s plan is to hand over all import and exporting over to Mexico thus eliminating thousands of American jobs. Bush’s plan is to include all trucking of these goods across America virtually eliminating all trucking done by Americans.

Now they claim that Bush actually has anti-terror laws giving him the right to arrest anybody who disagrees with him including Neo-Cons who he thinks protects the constitution too much, left-wingers, anybody with a conspiracy theory and another 20 “undesirable” people (like in the book 1984). These are all Conservative claims so forget about the “liberal media excuse”.

Will Bush’s N.A.U eliminate America? Will we be called the N.A.U and not America? Will American jobs be handed over to Mexico? Will Mexican immigration destroy America with Bush’s open borders? Is it true that this is Bush’s first step towards a George Orwell’s 1984 type government? Will he be responsible for the next terrorist attack? DID BUSH SELL AMERICA OUT? Don’t believe me, read all of it from Conservatives from these REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE articles and websites.

This Conservative site talks about the opening of our borders, selling out American jobs, and claiming Bush has a “globalist agenda, aka new world order”. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965

This is from a Christian conservative site which confirms the conservative findings http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50618

Christian conservative site which claims Bush and his shadow government (Orwell 1984) http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52164

Neo-Con Pat Buchanan’s interview on how Bush will be responsible for next terror attack http://prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/290806bushresponsible.htm

Official F.B.I flyer given to selected agents on who to track, spy, and arrest those who Bush says are terrorists. This includes Neo-Cons, left-wingers, people for the constitution, and a big list of other people Bush thinks are “desirables”. http://www.infowars.com/Images/fbi_flyer2.jpg (this is not from George Orwell’s 1984, but real life from Big Brother Bush).

I was very careful to include mostly conservative articles, thoughts, and sites to prove no bias. If there are any problems talk to conservatives.

2006-09-29 14:15:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

SK1(SW) (CDW S1 DIV)

That is all I have. Thanks.

2006-09-29 14:13:40 · 4 answers · asked by frozenfun 2 in Military

they think white people today must pay back for their ancestors' use of slaves; and Arnold Schwarzenegger must pay since his dad was in the Nazi party; and a lot of them think all German people today must pay for the holocaust.

2006-09-29 14:12:56 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

'question that dropping knowledge could've asked'

Note: this is the real wave for more info visit http://www.thisistherealwave.com

2006-09-29 14:11:12 · 15 answers · asked by wave 5 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-09-29 14:10:48 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

From the start there has been no real plan in Iraq, it has all been fly by the seat of Bush's pants. In contrast in the first Gulf War George Bush Sr. had a plan before he attacked, and a plan on how to get the job done.

2006-09-29 14:07:39 · 18 answers · asked by my_iq_135 5 in Politics

Amnesty International continues to "condemn", as if they were the ones to decide, America's treatment of terrorists, along with a lot of other countries, including Pakistan. Why don't they condemn terrorist's treatment of their hostages? These liberals need to get with the mainstream! Look at the public dialogue, we know that we can't treat terrorists like other people, they don't have the same "human rights". All over the world the standard is to treat terrorists differently from other criminals or enemies, because they're just more dangerous and you can't reason with them. And now congress has approved their own law saying the same. I hope they start using military tribunals for gang members too! Who does Amnesty International think they are? Why do these liberals coddle terrorists?

2006-09-29 14:06:15 · 7 answers · asked by Boludo 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-09-29 14:06:05 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Embassies & Consulates

It seam to have Europeanized certain Asian and African areas so that the local can walk through them again.

2006-09-29 14:05:31 · 10 answers · asked by ruffian 2 in Immigration

They don't have an original thought. They listen to their Air America during the day, get their talking points and bother everyone they can with the same stupid question. When someone shoots them down they start calling names.

2006-09-29 14:01:51 · 15 answers · asked by Jeff F 4 in Politics

to clinton and things about the Dem's grammer and how we phrase our sentences and things that don't Kill people and send us to war under lies and minor things that don't matter that much in the "scheme" of things? Yet we Dem's and Lib's can point out things like sending sexual emails to kids and raping the country for BILLIONS of dollars through the oil companies and other things the retardlicans seem to do ........

2006-09-29 14:01:36 · 14 answers · asked by politicallypuzzeled 3 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-09-29 13:56:11 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

im in my first year of college. I want to join the marines but i dont want to be screwed out of my education. can i still be in college while in the marines once out of basic, or do i serve 4-8 yrs then go to college? i just want to make sure that i wont be an adult that goes back to college. will i finish college faster in the marines?

2006-09-29 13:54:50 · 12 answers · asked by Guitar*Girl 2 in Military

Investor's Daily thinks it is, and I agree. It will reduce crime and lawlessness, as much on Mexico's side of the border as on ours.

"The Senate's expected passage of the Secure Fence Act of 2006, following the House's vote to build a $1.2 billion 700-mile border fence, is good news for all sides. But right off, Mexico's government is warning of disaster for U.S.-Mexico relations if the bill is passed and the fence is built.

"Such a thing, unfortunately, is a deterioration in the relationship," said Mexican Foreign Secretary Ernesto Derbez. "Shameful," added President Vicente Fox, calling it a new Berlin Wall.

They couldn't be more wrong.

Mexico is no enemy, but it wouldn't be looking at a fence if it didn't show so little regard for lawful boundaries in the first place.

It has failed so badly at it that one wonders what Mexico's idea of good relations with the U.S. is, given that no nation on Earth will tolerate an unchecked flood of people into its boundaries.

2006-09-29 13:53:11 · 8 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Immigration

2006-09-29 13:53:06 · 6 answers · asked by lexhome05 2 in Law & Ethics

that oil will finish in 2050?
that we will never live without conflicts?
that a tragedy will happen 2009, sepember 9th?

2006-09-29 13:52:29 · 12 answers · asked by pimpster 2 in Other - Politics & Government

They owe tons of money, 200$ water bill, trashed the place. And some people tell me I can't go in - it's my freakin house. I'd at least like to clean it . It stinks.We had to call all kinds of local services on them...

2006-09-29 13:52:20 · 8 answers · asked by mabell1025 3 in Law & Ethics

Have you ever had sex with a virgin? It's like..., BLOODY hell!
You think Abu Ghraib was torture!
Whomever told you you are going to heaven with 70 virgins is REALLY telling you, "You are Going to Hell!"
And besides, did you ever stop to think that the virgins WITH you in (supposed) heaven might have gotten there...,
BECAUSE OF YOU?!
Would you really want to face that virgin for all of eternity?
OUCH!
So let me say brother, as long as your bomb belt DOESN'T go off, it's never too late to convert to Christianity!

2006-09-29 13:52:07 · 10 answers · asked by Number1son 3 in Other - Politics & Government

I have discovered a system that works 100% of the time all of the time for all humans. How would you assist in making that come into reality? Serious answers will earn you the secret. usurpers just sucking points won't be deamed worthy. i do not suffer fools lightly when a job of this size has to be brought about rapidly.

2006-09-29 13:51:10 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation

2006-09-29 13:49:45 · 16 answers · asked by ruffian 2 in Other - Politics & Government

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060930/ap_on_re_mi_ea/al_qaida_tape_15

2006-09-29 13:47:34 · 10 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics

Currently in a legal dispute regarding a will.
We fired our lawyer (who was also the person who made up the will in question) and hired a new lawyer.

Suddenly, our old, scorned lawyer comes forth for the opposition claiming he did not create the will correctly as there was no witness in the room at the time of signing. So the will is null and void.

I've also been told that we cannot sue for malpractice as the only one who can is the deceased.

The entire thing sounds so fishy to me. Can this be true?

Thanks!

2006-09-29 13:46:08 · 4 answers · asked by amievil13 1 in Law & Ethics

Before some bright repuglican blames Bill Clinton for Mark Foleys indescretions.

2006-09-29 13:44:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

and withdraw our troops since the majority of Iraqis would prefer that we just leave?

2006-09-29 13:44:26 · 17 answers · asked by NONAME 3 in Military

ing? How simple can you be to think the way it really is can be defined as wrong or right, win or lose, with or against? With all the facts that are out there regarding the truth's behind this "culture of corruption" why on earth would anyone support these unaccountable neo-con bastards that have been plundering our country for six years now? There are good republicans out there--look for the ones that oppose Bush once and awhile. Trying to tell me that this is the way it is and then trying to jam it down my throat just does'nt work for me. What do you think?

2006-09-29 13:44:12 · 12 answers · asked by scottyurb 5 in Politics

I think their un-constitunal. The currant drug laws are designed to protect the stupid, from themselves. If dumb people die from over doses of, crack,smack, or what ever. They will not reproduce, which means no more dumb, stupid kids, for the rest of us to have to deal with, when they grow-up. There's another good reason to legalize drugs, all drugs. The goverment could tax the hell out of them, and maybe just maybe, balance the budget.

2006-09-29 13:43:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

what is it... cuz i was told at school to call some tamle guy a tamle tiger and he was so pissed?

2006-09-29 13:42:12 · 3 answers · asked by pimpster 2 in Politics

2006-09-29 13:40:53 · 7 answers · asked by calypso4811 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-09-29 13:40:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-09-29 13:38:47 · 20 answers · asked by primamaria04 5 in Law Enforcement & Police