Investor's Daily thinks it is, and I agree. It will reduce crime and lawlessness, as much on Mexico's side of the border as on ours.
"The Senate's expected passage of the Secure Fence Act of 2006, following the House's vote to build a $1.2 billion 700-mile border fence, is good news for all sides. But right off, Mexico's government is warning of disaster for U.S.-Mexico relations if the bill is passed and the fence is built.
"Such a thing, unfortunately, is a deterioration in the relationship," said Mexican Foreign Secretary Ernesto Derbez. "Shameful," added President Vicente Fox, calling it a new Berlin Wall.
They couldn't be more wrong.
Mexico is no enemy, but it wouldn't be looking at a fence if it didn't show so little regard for lawful boundaries in the first place.
It has failed so badly at it that one wonders what Mexico's idea of good relations with the U.S. is, given that no nation on Earth will tolerate an unchecked flood of people into its boundaries.
2006-09-29
13:53:11
·
8 answers
·
asked by
DAR
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
In the long run, this fence won't mean bad relations with Mexico, but more sovereignty to both sides. The current situation on the border, where criminals operate unchecked, is exactly the opposite of that. And a million illegal aliens crossing into the U.S. from Mexico each year creates big social problems for both countries.
Rule of law on all sides is undermined with the growth of underworld smuggling rackets on the borderlands. Meanwhile, U.S. cities are flooded with illegals who impose. On the Mexican side, children grow up with absentee parents, as parents head north.
Vicious human-smuggling networks have grown, and a war between them is escalating, mainly on the Mexico side. It's precisely because there are still holes in the border to fight over.
Ending access to those routes will raise the costs of drug smuggling and discourage illegal immigration. It will also make drug traffickers and people smugglers easier for Mexican law enforcement to corner..."
Thoughts?
2006-09-29
13:55:24 ·
update #1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20060929/bs_ibd_ibd/2006929issues
2006-09-29
13:55:40 ·
update #2
chatteru they passed 1.2 billion in funding. It isn't enough, but it is enough to get started.
2006-09-29
14:04:57 ·
update #3