English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This will be long but please read on because this is very, very important. Could Conservatives be correct when they say that George Bush has a globalist agenda? Or are Conservatives spreading this Bush’s New World Order agenda theory for no good reason? Are the conservative claims that Bush is opening up our borders allowing Immigration from Mexico true? They say that America will be eliminated. They say the American dollar is to be switched to the N.A.U dollar, and N.A.U laws will over ride American laws. Conservatives claim that Bush’s open border policy will allow terrorists free reign in America, thus proving that Bush’s record on terror is the worst in American history. They claim that the next terror attack will be Bush’s fault.

Conservatives say that “Bush’s North American Union” was designed by Bush to eliminate American jobs, and have them handed over to Mexico. Conservative Republicans claim that Bush’s plan is to hand over all import and exporting over to Mexico thus eliminating thousands of American jobs. Bush’s plan is to include all trucking of these goods across America virtually eliminating all trucking done by Americans.

Now they claim that Bush actually has anti-terror laws giving him the right to arrest anybody who disagrees with him including Neo-Cons who he thinks protects the constitution too much, left-wingers, anybody with a conspiracy theory and another 20 “undesirable” people (like in the book 1984). These are all Conservative claims so forget about the “liberal media excuse”.

Will Bush’s N.A.U eliminate America? Will we be called the N.A.U and not America? Will American jobs be handed over to Mexico? Will Mexican immigration destroy America with Bush’s open borders? Is it true that this is Bush’s first step towards a George Orwell’s 1984 type government? Will he be responsible for the next terrorist attack? DID BUSH SELL AMERICA OUT? Don’t believe me, read all of it from Conservatives from these REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE articles and websites.

This Conservative site talks about the opening of our borders, selling out American jobs, and claiming Bush has a “globalist agenda, aka new world order”. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965

This is from a Christian conservative site which confirms the conservative findings http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50618

Christian conservative site which claims Bush and his shadow government (Orwell 1984) http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52164

Neo-Con Pat Buchanan’s interview on how Bush will be responsible for next terror attack http://prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/290806bushresponsible.htm

Official F.B.I flyer given to selected agents on who to track, spy, and arrest those who Bush says are terrorists. This includes Neo-Cons, left-wingers, people for the constitution, and a big list of other people Bush thinks are “desirables”. http://www.infowars.com/Images/fbi_flyer2.jpg (this is not from George Orwell’s 1984, but real life from Big Brother Bush).

I was very careful to include mostly conservative articles, thoughts, and sites to prove no bias. If there are any problems talk to conservatives.

2006-09-29 14:15:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

The conservatives believe that America is theirs solely, with all of the American tax payers money and wealth. Bush wants Congress to give another 100,000 billion to Iraq before the elections. I think Bush should take the money from the Republican party myself. I am sick of the insults from the Republicans to other Americans that wont attach their purse strings to them.

2006-09-29 14:50:11 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 16 0

First Pat Buchanan is NOT a Neo-Con. Neo-Cons are former Liberals that are happy having the gov't fix things and transform culture.

Liberals who see that the transformations toward Prgressive society went too far and say Conservatives are sorta correct are Neo-Cons (New Conservative).

Pat Buchanan started as a Conservative like the 1964 Barry Goldwater and William F Buckley Jr. In the late 1980's Pat went over to the John Birch, anti-semetic , extreme of the Conservative movement. In 2000's Pat is a right-wing Populist. He is no Con, Paleo-Con, or Neo-Con. He is a Populist. He has authority among Conservatives, or special insight into Neo-Con thinking.

Secondly your sources are all the same author just reprinted in differnt arenas. Corsi is a nut-job. Corsi is closer to the Conspiracy-monger Alex Jones than Rush Limbaugh. Corsi is not an insider spilling the beans on where Neo-Cons are headed. He is selling Conspiracy.

2006-09-29 21:26:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anthony M 6 · 1 0

Better look at your calendar. Most of what Bush is doing now will be inherited by the NEXT president and the next congress. And according to liberals, they will succeed in winning one or both elections. How much do you want to bet that that government will use these tools instead of reversing them in the name of liberal humanity.

Bush does not represent the conservative viewpoint regarding open borders. But he looks like a gestapo compared to immigration "reforms" proposed by liberal democrats.

By the way "Jenny is hot" - Nice picture

2006-09-29 22:58:42 · answer #3 · answered by freebird 6 · 0 0

Pat Buchanan is a fool. He does not represent the conservative movement. He is a bitter isolationist Republican that does not believe in free trade.

2006-09-29 21:21:19 · answer #4 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2 2

No unfortunately....I am a small govt type person but there are areas that require protection...The president feels the same way but he does not seem to be protecting things that should be protected and he is regulating the things that shouldn't be...Vote Green for a change

2006-09-29 21:19:53 · answer #5 · answered by loofa36 6 · 0 1

birdsnake, I tried to email you to tell you that's one of the best answers I've ever seen on here. I couldn't have said it better, myself! Great! Thanks! And who is going to read this infinitely long boring rant. No good neo-con would say such a thing.

2006-09-29 21:34:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Remy D is a idiot. why do non Americans come to this web site and talk fecal matter like they are still in another country?

2006-09-29 21:20:48 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 2 0

STOP IT!
I was called the most ignorant person on Yahoo.
I was rather proud of that. It was hard to do.
AND NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO TAKE MY TITLE AWAY.
You have just listed a bunch of Terrorist Progaganda.

2006-09-29 21:20:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Stay calm everyone, the tinfoilhat company is working overtime to supply the increased demand.

2006-09-29 21:21:09 · answer #9 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 4 0

Wow.

Who typed that for you? Who turned your computer on?

wtf?

Almost every post on this site is stupid, maliceous, one sided, or paranoid but this is the first post that I have seen that combines everyone's prejudice, ignorance, and neurocies into a single semi-coherent rant.

Sir, you are the king of internet forums.

Bravo............Bravo

2006-09-29 21:29:43 · answer #10 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers