He was staying the course.
Osama and the Carlyle Group have been business partners with the Bush family for years.
Saddam was an enemy of the Bush family for years.
See he is staying the course.
Go big Red Go
2006-09-29 14:49:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You should really pay attention to what is going on in the world, instead of making things up as you go along. President Bush has never said that Saddam had anything to do with 9/11.... Osama is free because he is hiding in a cave in some of the most rugged mountains in the world... there isn't a big billboard pointing to his exact location. Try to come up with some real problems for a change.
2006-09-29 21:33:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by lordkelvin 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ok the White House publically admitted the 9/11 and Iraq had nothing to do with each other and yet people still think it did! Wake up America. They are two completely separate events. The war in Iraq has cost over half a trillion dollars. If we put all of that money into catching bin Laden we would have caught him in a week!
2006-09-29 21:15:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by quickblur 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
Once Halliburton, Enron and Unilocal were doing business in Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden wasn't important. The next target for the war-business was Iraq (Halliburton).
2006-09-30 00:09:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually if you knew your recent history you would know the CONGRESS AND DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR THE WAR!!! It isnt Bush's war!! You are another unfortunate foolish victim of OLD liberal propaganda.
And if you kept up in the news you would know Bush doesnt maintain 9/11 was committed by Hussein but Osama Bin Ladin. He used to think that because the inteligence he was getting from the CIA suggested that there were links between Al-Queda and Pre-2003 Iraq. Bin Ladin is FAR from free. He cant show himself in any halfway civilized nation without getting arrested or killed. He has been hiding these 4 years in the vast mountain ranges in Afganistan or possibly Pakistan where we have been engaging Al-Queda on and off.
Why do I waste my time spoon-feeding braindead liberals? Youre probably going to walk away from this drooling saying "duhhhh well Bush still sucks and everything is his fault."
2006-09-29 21:53:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
other than the fact that Osama and Bush (2 good friends and VERY unreliable sources) say that Osama is responsible for 911, there has never ever been a single piece of evidence produced to implicate Osama in the Sept 11th bombings. it's all about scapegoating and the blame game...in other words...POLITICS, taken to a heartless extreme that has cost the lives of many many people on both sides of the conflict.
will we ever know who was truly responsible for the WTC bombings. probably not. but, it is more important to realize that we can't just blame it all on one single guy. instead we need to work towards changing the conditions that make things like that possible.
sadly, I feel we are also quite far away from this goal
2006-09-29 21:30:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Do you get out much? Bush never blamed 9/11 on Saddam. He blamed him for funding terrorism, which he did, - $25,000 to sucide bombers familiaes, WMDs, which he had - ask John Kerry, violating UN resolutions - a whole bunch, shooting at coalition patrol planes, attempting to get yellow cake - which he did - ask Richard Clarke. Finding that he executed and stored thousands od dead bodies of his own people and had rape rooms was simply a plus. You approved of Saddam and wanted him to remain in power?
Osama Pig Laden is hiding under a rock in the mountains of Pakistan. If you think it is so easy to find him there, I will loan you a rifle and you can try and get him.
2006-09-29 21:21:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Colorado 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
He never blamed 9/11 on Saddam. That war-pig, Osama fled the battlefield like the coward that he is. He is hiding in a very, very rugged area in southeast Afghanistan or northern Pakistan and is surrounded by Islamic tribesmen who are loyal to his cause.
2006-09-29 21:13:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
we tried looking for osama and for the most part we gave up. the republicans have been looking for a chance to invade iraq years before 9/11 and now they got a chance. we just searched for osama to please the public we are doing something about him
2006-09-29 21:15:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Can we spell, MONEY, he and his mafioso are reaping large rewards from this war over the lives of our solders and the Iraqi citizens. Repuglicans don't think he has done anything wrong to be impeach, hell after he impeached he should have to stand trial for his war crimes.
2006-09-29 21:21:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋