I am against any form of terrorism, be it used as a form of war or for whatever purposes. However, I also abhor the means by which trigger-happy GeoBlair and the Israelis are fighting against it.
Bombing civilian quarters and destroying infrastructures with F-16s from above is anything but fighting the terrorists. The terrorists are invisible, that's why it is the civilians who are being killed in greater numbers. And Lebanon is being bombed 20-30 years backwards in its developement. The only outcome of this wanton destruction is a new breed of Hezbolla would be born again. And a new cycle begins.
So, if I do not agree with Bush's "tactics" in Lebanon, does that mean I support terrorism? This is what I dislike in Bush: ARROGANCY, SUPREMACY!
Analysing the ROOT CAUSES of the problems in the Middle East and finding a lasting solution to it is the only road map to peace, anything else is just Bushing and Blairing around.
Israel :give back to the Arabs their OCCUPIED LANDS.
2006-07-28
18:02:57
·
12 answers
·
asked by
philip y
2
in
Politics