Politics & Government - 30 June 2006

who was the best president

2006-06-30 20:20:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

do you think god wants us to accept a palestinian state next to his choosed people?
mideast issues and weathe it is ok to have a palestinian state, do you think those people have any rights to live but what about the bible and what god said that this land belongs to israel..?

2006-06-30 20:18:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-06-30 20:18:30 · 5 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2 in Politics

2006-06-30 20:12:59 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-06-30 20:12:48 · 11 answers · asked by ann 1 in Politics

Which do you use when voting?
Vote for:

a candidate that matches you exactly on one or two issues that you are truely passionate about,

or

the person that best matches you overall?

Why?

I offer no opinion on this I just want to see what you really think!

2006-06-30 20:11:15 · 3 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Politics

2006-06-30 20:07:13 · 11 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2 in Politics

how about this:
Instead of tickets, the cops asks where you are coming from and then takes you back there and makes you drive it again at the speed limit, just like mommy used to do
"No running in the house! Go back and WALK this time!"
I think people would rather have a ticket than be very, very late if caught!
It might actually work and cost less (money wise, at least).

What do you think?

2006-06-30 20:05:52 · 17 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-06-30 20:03:40 · 16 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2 in Politics

Why not let a cop break down any door or look anywhere, and pay a BIG price if they are wrong?
I wonder if a cop that breaks down the wrong door would automatically face huge fines or such, would not be a better cop?
I would love to allow them to go where it is known that things are happening and clean it up without the waste of energy and the time (which allows criminal to escape) or warrants and such.
AS LONG as these guys would have to pay a very high price for causing, even the slightest unwarranted damage!
search your car for no reason and find drugs or weapons or a kidnapped girl? off to jail no problem
find nothing? the cop pays you $150 out of his own pocket!
would this make cops plant stuff?
yes but only the cops that do that anyway!

I could be wrong, but what do you think?
and please no name calling. all of your ideas are not gold either, you know!

2006-06-30 20:02:00 · 6 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Law & Ethics

Have you ever notice that when you call the local police to report for emergence such as robbery/heard a gun short around your neighborhood, they takes at least 2 hours+ to arrived.
From my experiences most of the time, firemen were arrived way faster then the policemen. Which make me wonder are they really trying their best to do their job? Or they try to save their *** by avoiding physical contact with the bad guys.

I don’t want the think police are sucks, but according to all the negative image of police. Such as:
1. The fact shows on above
2. For most of us all we experience is getting speeding/parking tickets from them.
3. Seeing them hiding around supermarket eating donut.
4. Unnecessary beating to suspect which show on TV.
Which make wonder is there anymore kinds still want to be a police when they grow up?

2006-06-30 19:54:12 · 10 answers · asked by hennis1028 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-06-30 19:52:50 · 14 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2 in Politics

did you do it?
I take the fifth!
It is on TV, in movies all the time.
it is a yes or no question and the only real reason not to answer is because the answer is:
yes!
But should criminals be allowed this?
an innocent man cannot answer yes.
if guilty were not allowed to 'not self-incriminate' would not our system be better off. you can have your lawyer from the get go. and all of your conversations will be video taped for evidence.
an innocent man will easily be ble to talk openly with his lawyer and a guilty one would be in deep, youknowwhat, if he did!
an innocent man would be able to therefore mount a reaonable defense.
If a guilty man could not help his lawyer and therefore be convicted, it seems better, as law's goal IS to convict the guilty!
I understand the reason so that they cannot 'beat it out of you' and you confess just to save your a$$ at that moment, but that happens anyway.
why not make the cops who do something like that pay the price along with this new way

2006-06-30 19:52:18 · 2 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-30 19:49:34 · 8 answers · asked by imbossy 1 in Government

and im scared cus i wanna get a job but im scared to turn myself in....whats gonna happent o me...what are my penalties...i am in the state of CALIFORNIA........PLEASE HELP

2006-06-30 19:48:01 · 12 answers · asked by sexy luv 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-06-30 19:46:56 · 11 answers · asked by Bob 3 in Politics

2006-06-30 19:43:53 · 19 answers · asked by mats13jmac24 1 in Politics

Who was Spiro Agnew?

2006-06-30 19:42:15 · 4 answers · asked by Bob 3 in Politics

i am confident, that the founding fathers had no reason to see nor any way to guess of the advances in technology and therefore built the trial by jury system that we use.
why, with all of the video surveilence around and absolute proof of guilt (on occasion), like DNA, can we just not skip the trial?
I realize that this could not be in every case and often it would be business as usual, but sometimes it is really unneeded. don't you think so? or do you disagree.
please do not make up your own examples and argue that that would be a case against it, I already gave that often this option would not be taken, nor should it be, but sometimes, it might be.

2006-06-30 19:40:51 · 11 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-30 19:39:46 · 11 answers · asked by Dylan 2 in Politics

I'm thinking he'd ask what 3 letter animal he looks that starts with the letter a

2006-06-30 19:32:56 · 17 answers · asked by l l 2 in Politics

Cher-and many many more..........but I want to understand the reason why some others seem so soft on illegal alien invaders......do they not differenciate between legal and illegal, I think we all agree legal immigrants are fully welcome.

2006-06-30 19:30:25 · 8 answers · asked by WriteAndWrong 2 in Immigration

Can it be related to the war on terror and such?

2006-06-30 19:24:06 · 6 answers · asked by cyberfan 2 in Other - Politics & Government

I have been friends with this guy for a couple years and we were abot to start dating. However he just got convicted for a previous offence and he's behind bars. I wanted to contact him somehow and let him know I haven't forgotten him but I don't know how. I called the local prison and asked them if they allow letters or visits, they said no. Does that make sense? I won't give up, I don't want him to think I've forgoten him. How can i get in touch with him? Please help!

2006-06-30 19:19:37 · 11 answers · asked by candiecorn 1 in Law & Ethics

People claim bush attacked Iraq for oil... He gets none of this oil, please explain what this means.

2006-06-30 19:09:23 · 14 answers · asked by asu_mikey 2 in Military

the rich countries till they dont want to help to the poor countries so we need to help to the poor countries

2006-06-30 19:08:06 · 4 answers · asked by yp_rajkumar_san_jose 1 in Other - Politics & Government

people today don't care about our environment.i care is anybody with me? if so answer.

2006-06-30 19:07:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Are people, "The General Population" so STUPID that "The Government Actually Does Know Best?"

2006-06-30 19:06:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

this will be the true identifier of the asker!!!!!

Character is like a fingerprint!

2006-06-30 19:04:10 · 12 answers · asked by Americans1st 2 in Immigration

I think the Federal Government is, and has been during my lifetime, working AGAINST actual freedom. Am I PARANOID?

2006-06-30 19:03:57 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government