I think BMI is not accurate at all since it doesn't take into consideration body-frame, age etc.
Now, this is a REAL case, my ex-girlfriend. She was a model when younger weighing in about 49-50 kg (110lbs) -her height is 1,76 m or 5'9 - and she was just looking gorgeous, nice looking behind, the breasts were definetely there :P, etc. She didn't look "anorexic" to me and she was completely healthy. Now, 10 years later (she's 30) she's about 64 kg (142 lbs) and she's got quite a lot of cellulite on her thighs, saggy looking skin on arms, not quite overweight but definetely approaching that marker...Now, according to BMI she's almost underweight at a BMI of 20,5 - 21. When she was weighing 49 kg her BMI was 16 which is classified as severely thin, sick ,etc. This is stupid, she looked and feeled much healthier than, she was exercising and NO health problems whatsoever.
In case U're wondering, her putting on weight wasn't the reasons we split up, we had other problems.
So do U agree ????
2007-02-01
02:10:32
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Diet & Fitness