opinions only please no fanboys, just a discussion
i got a 360 in the summer 2006 and returned it within 2 months. am i right in thinking the ps3's potential will last much longer than the 360 and wii. some people have not lifted their wii controllers for months. one huge difference is the cost, if you add all the items in the ps3 it costs much less than the 360. the 360 does not have the wi-fi adaptor, hd hard drive etc theyre all seperate wheras the ps3 already has it. another thing is that the ps3 discs can hold up to 50gb worth of data which means more quality graphics and content for ps3 games, the 50gb storage on blue-ray discs is going up to 200gb. however the 360 discs can only hold upto 9gb on their dvd discs, microsoft are now deciding whether to incorporate the hd dvd drive in their 360 which will allow the discs to hold 30gb but doing that wont they make their current gamers angry as developers will have to make two versions of 360 games, one for normal dvd and one for hd dvd. game developers are moaning that new 360 games have to be stored on 2 -3 discs because 1 disc is not enough. Now mate are you willing to change disc every single time a new chapter in the game comes, with the ps3 you dont. By the way im getting the 40gb ps3 this november :-)
playstation online free gaming whereas xbox live £40
please dont mention the wiii as its not in the same league maybe fun for a little while but i got bored
2007-10-24
03:16:30
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Hot_Luv
2
in
PlayStation