There have never been any convincing studies that have established that such an assasination could have physically been performed by Oswald. Further, testimony of witnesses and other persuasive evidence has established that there was more than one gunman shooting at the President. Finally, there have been many analyses showing that the official story has so many holes in it that you could drive a Boeing 757 through it without being touched. As a result of the overwhelmiung evidence that Oswald could not have been the assassin, and the lack of any evidence that he could have been the assassin, polls of Americans have repeatedly shown that most Americans do not believe the official story. And outside of America, polls show that an even larger precentage of people don't believe the official story. Does this mean that the media is tacitly going along with the conspiracy, or are the people in the media who keep saying the false statements about Oswald merely stupid?
2007-11-26
12:24:05
·
9 answers
·
asked by
andy_carlssin
1
in
Media & Journalism