In an effort to raise the level of discourse on these pages, I commend the following sites to your attention:
http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/07/table-of-conten.html
http://www.climateaudit.org/
The first site is written by a non-scientist, but he's clearly a smart guy and is thinking rationally about the issues. He makes some good points, although on others he's simply uninformed.
The second site is by a guy who is really looking hard at the data, trying to find flaws in methodology. He is biased: his goal is to debunk anthropogenic global warming, but he is constrained by the scientific process. He tends to a little crankiness about access to original data and algorithms, but hey, that's OK.
So I suggest you deniers read these sites, and let's have some genuinely rational discussions about real issues.
2007-08-22
03:27:19
·
4 answers
·
asked by
cosmo
7
in
Global Warming