Assuming Universal Health Care would cost you much less, assuming you would get quality care, assuming there were absolutely no ceiling on your coverage... would you still be opposed to Universal Health Care soley on the grounds that your tax dollars were going to provide complete health coverage to others who didn't pay the same amount of taxes, or any taxes?
Would you chose to pay significantly more for private insurance, even if the only 'benefit' was the satisfaction of knowing that people who had no insurance, or less insurance, were suffering because of it?
2007-08-09
13:17:38
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics