Okay, there is no GOOD way to ask that question, but to clarify, I am not a vorarephiliac, and find vorarephilia particularly distateful. (Not that I have any moral imperative against vorarephiliacs, I just couldn't handle that)... That said, after I die, what would make it something that is wrong to eat me? (assuming I am otherwise healthy when I die).
I was thinking about things earlier, and the options society presents are:
A) Make your family pay thousands so they can get together and be sad (or happy as the case may be, you could make it a party in theory.)
B) Have your body burned, don't waste the money, but still let an asset go to waste.
C) (though it is still rejected almost as much as cannibalism) Cryogenics... incredibly expensive and probably impractical....
I don't have kuru, there's a good chance I won't be diseased at all, and people are starving elsewhere in the world... Why would there be such a big taboo on feeding them?
2007-04-17
19:14:26
·
10 answers
·
asked by
yelxeH
5