Atheism by definition is the lack of belief. For example: if told that there are giant invisible spiders in my backyard and I reject that claim, I am a disbeliever of those giant spiders. If told there are squirrels in my back yard while being shown photo evidence, and I still choose not to believe given evidence that at that momment I don't see any squirrels, I become someone that believes there are no squirrels. In conclusion, the difference between disbelieving and not believing is that the first takes the stance based on no evidence and the second takes the stance based on rejecting evidence because there is other (or better) evidence to refute those.
All your religions are based on ZERO evidence. Saying "the evidence is all around you" is not evidence. Saying "just like a watchmaker has a maker the human must have a maker" isn't evidence either. What you have in your hands is ignorance being passed off as evidence.
Understood Theists?
2007-01-05
13:36:46
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Alucard
4