Do you ever confuse the two? As an atheist I see myself doing this sometimes. There is a big difference between saying "there is a creator, but just because he created the universe doesn't necessarily mean he's omnipotent, omniscient, or omnibenevolent, just that he's capable of creating" and saying "there is a god whom I have a personal relationship with, he looks out for me and talks to me, and he wants me to praise him"
The first one is almost reasonable, although I still don't believe it, and the second one (IMO) is baseless and arrogant. The first one isn't really enough to build a religion off of because it's so bland that there's really no point in worshipping this entity.
I think atheists are doing ourselves a disservice when we blur the distinction between the two and someone who takes the more bland approach will justifiably get defensive when we do.
Can this bland approach exist without religion? What reason other than faith can one have to suspect a creator?
2007-12-27
03:26:06
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality