According to the Lutheran Church, they aren't. In fact, Martin Luther was a major force in the arguments during the Reformation concerning various disputed books of the Bible. These included the Apocrypha, and others, including the Book of Revelation, which Martin Luther for much of his life believed was NOT scriptural!
Lutheran theologiansmake a distinction between the books of the New Testament which were unanimously received as canonical in the early church (the so-called Homologoumena or undisputed books) and the books which were disputed by some (the Antilegomena). In this class of 'disputed books' are the Epistle to the Hebrews, James, Jude, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, and the Revelation of John. These books are considered to be canonical in modern Lutheran churches, with the caveat that they are not quite on the same level as the other books as complete expressions of evangelical truth, and should be used with care.
So can we be true Christians, and interpret like Luther did?
2007-09-04
10:00:44
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality