Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has recently concluded her study of gryphons. She has determined that they conclusively prove the literal truth of the Bible.
A gryphon is a mythical creature with the body of a lion and the head and wings of an eagle. If evolution were true, then this creature would have to be a lion-eagle hybrid. However, in the Em Adjineri study, the lion would not mate with the eagle.
This proves that the gryphon could not have evolved. Therefore, it must have been created by God. If God created the gryphon, then intelligent design is true. Therefore, the Bible is literally true.
2007-09-04 10:17:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It is interesting the Griffons that Gaurded the ever flowing bowl of wine, all the Griffons ever did was show a parental protection.
It is more interesting how most of the great Hybrids were actually children of the Echidna and most of them were corrupt.
The Griffon is one of the truely divine Hybrids of Creation. What this proves is not only the existence of an intelligent designer but many not so intelligent designers.
2007-09-04 10:29:19 · answer #1 · answered by Link strikes back 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How to explain gryphons? Hmmm... to quote you "A gryphon is a mythical creature" So you are trying to use a made up creature to challenge a scientific theory? Or perhaps I misunderstood what you are getting at. Could the reference in the Bible perhaps be a mistranslation? The Bible mention unicorns too. Though many scholars think it originally referred to an ox.
2007-09-04 10:34:59 · answer #2 · answered by Lancelot 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drats! We've been found out!
Gryphons are the cryptozoological equivalent of crockoducks.
P.S. Is she related to the prominent Dr. M. Aginery of Bob Evans University?
2007-09-04 10:25:46 · answer #3 · answered by Peter D 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A gryphon is a mythical creature.
2007-09-04 10:23:56 · answer #4 · answered by lilith 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First flaw; your textual content cloth assumes that hundreds of thousands of years in the past, giraffes all had short necks - then you say purely the long necked giraffes survived the flood as a results of fact they held their heads above water. So while did they start to pop up, if all giraffes all those years in the past had short necks? 2nd flaw; you do no longer point out the flowers in those days. i think many of the section the place the 1st giraffes lived, was shrubs and different low transforming into wood. The flowers then developed with the aspects; wood grew greater and the giraffe developed with the flowers. that is all a count of survival. third flaw; weren't there giraffes on the Ark? Fourth - and intense - flaw; so, as a results of fact somebody is a creationist, they do no longer ought to study transitional fossils, in spite of the fact that that is *impossible* to disclaim those fossils' presence, as a results of fact they bleedin' exist? No ask your self you adult males are by no capacity taken heavily.
2016-10-17 23:10:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're absolutely right...and it's not just gryphons. take harpies for example...in a private study u.r. ludacris tired to duplicate women and vultures having...well...you know.
this failed abysmally ending with the women beating him senseless. since the harpy can't possibly have evolved they must have been created. although i'm not sure how intellegent this actually was.
thus is evolution disproved...
2007-09-04 11:37:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Someone named "Em Adjeneri" (say it ten times fast) was researching mythical creatures?
Shuyeah, as if!
Save this idiocy for April first, Jack.
2007-09-04 10:43:11 · answer #7 · answered by sgtcosgrove 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gryphons are just a pretentious way to spell Griffin.
2007-09-04 10:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mythical creatures are supposed to conform to the theory of evolution? Didn't know that one!
2007-09-04 10:39:15 · answer #9 · answered by SMS 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying because a "MYTHICAL" creature couldn't have evolved, evolution is false? What about the Sphinx? Half human half lion, it doesn't fu*cking exist is how to explain it!
2007-09-04 10:25:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋