I've asked many questions here about the lack of historical evidence for Jesus existing.
The same stuff always gets thrown forth: gospels, Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger.
Each time I point out the gospels are discredited (Just the fact that the first census in Judea happened years after Herod's death undermines their credibilty in two key areas. 1. The reason for going to Bethlehem. 2. Herod's order to kill the children forcing Jesus's family to flee to Egypt), The passages from Josephus (written in 92CE) appear to have been added by translators in one case and copied from another source (the same source used in Luke's gospel) in the other. Tacitus dosn't directly refer to a Jesus, and gets pilot's title wrong. Pliny the Younger just mentions christians, not Jesus.
Why does it seem that christians are unprepared to look objectively at the evidence and seriously examine wheter such a man existed beyond any reasonable doubt?
2007-08-02
04:11:27
·
49 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality