You believe in a ultimate cause, just not a personal God, but logically they are the same thing and serve the same purpose,or fill the same position in a rational system. Except we give it more detail, we go further and say that this cause is not just some random act of conglomerate power and mass. We say you do not go back far enough, you have stopped at an unexplained ,another natural in need of a cause, whereas we go to the final definiton of what must be. Which must by logical necessity be Something as ridiculous and absurd as a God existing forever, so that we might as well accept that it IS GOD.
Is this a fair analysis to you?
2006-12-25
13:20:48
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Socinian F
3
in
Religion & Spirituality