This isn't a rhetorical question. Let's say someone goes to Jerry Falwell's Liberty University and takes a cosmology or physics class, but the class says the universe is 6,000 years old.
Later on, he applies to UCLA, is accepted, but the school makes him retake a slew of classes because Liberty's version of science isn't compatible with the overwhelming opinion of scientists.
Is that a violation of religious freedom? IF it is, do you think it's fair to the student to put him in a class where he's expected to be familiar with traditional physics, but won't be?
This is an extreme example, but you could come up with so many more examples. What if a student goes to a Seventh Day Adventist high school that omits classical literature because (I'm not making this up), they think stuff like Ernest Hemingway is "sinful".
Both of my examples are real possibilities. Is it more important to be sensitive to religious sensibilities, or keep rigorous academic standards?
2006-12-09
16:59:28
·
10 answers
·
asked by
STFU Dude
6
in
Religion & Spirituality