After all every gospel, even the much venerated gospel of Mark, is riddled with geographic inaccuracies. Did'nt he know where he was?
You're "eyewitnness" accounts (you refer to people like Josephus (a pharisee) and Tacitus, (a Roman Pagan) were both born years after the supposed death of jesus!
Not much in the way of eyewitnesses huh? They'd be thrown out of any court with credentials like that.
In fact, the "divinity" of jesus is a forgery, a myth written by a man named Eusebius in 324CE. Nothing is written about the divinity of jesus before that date!
Wierd huh?
So please, if you must, continue to childishly cling to your mythology. But please, do NOT insult people or make yourselves out to be more stupid than you already are by claiming it is "historical in nature" because of course, it's not.
No acual accounts exist to support the existence of jesus except as a mythological fabrication.
(and if you can't find the question, find the ? up there a bit...)
2006-07-01
02:14:55
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality