Politics - 27 July 2007

They love to point out the errors of cons and repubs so is it safe to assume that it is alright for a liberal to be immoral because they don't claim to uphold 'family values' anyway?

2007-07-27 03:52:59 · 10 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

I think they have a guilty conscience and a need to exagerate to cover all their bases.

2007-07-27 03:44:22 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

There's enough scandal in the GOP to make the assertion look ridiculous I thought I'd ask.

NO religous point of view has a lock on either American politicval party, and vice versa.

2007-07-27 03:42:44 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

by our government, and not have an emotional reaction . . . would you agree or disagree that whoever controls Iraq controls the middle east . . . whoever controls the middle east controls the world . . . and (leave ethics at the door) victory in Iraq would ultimately secure unprecedented power for the United States for generations yet to come . . .

2007-07-27 03:41:09 · 12 answers · asked by CHARITY G 7

It reminds me of the whole Ken Starr investigation.....

2007-07-27 03:39:03 · 21 answers · asked by J.R. 2

It's For Speech class, I have to debate why there wouldn't be a woman president within 20 years. Thank Alot!!!

2007-07-27 03:33:59 · 17 answers · asked by The Creative One 3

we need him to clean this country up.

2007-07-27 03:20:43 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I assume Pastor Jack W. Hayford is a political scientist!

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1185379004789&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

2007-07-27 03:13:13 · 11 answers · asked by Page 4

I believe that in 2003, instead of Iraq being invaded, real terrorist sponsoring countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Pakistan should have been invaded. We should have let Saddam stay in power and we should have funded him to help raise a real army so he could invade Iran for us so we didn't have to reinstate the draft in the US. Saddam hated Iran ten times more than he hated the US and he would have invaded Iran once he heard they were seeking nuclear power. Saddam, no matter how hard he went on his people, was a useful ally to the US and we should have never even have invaded Iraq in 1990 because he would have still been our ally and he would have still had a real army. I think Bush should cut all ties to the totaltarian government of Saudi Arabia, but he makes way too much money to cut the ties.

2007-07-27 03:12:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, in 2007, what is the point of the Tories?

A (still) small bunch of white males going on about the way things used to be and marginal issues such as grammar schools. Can you imagine this lot being a credible government again?

2007-07-27 03:12:19 · 18 answers · asked by AlllyB 2

I'm sure they are salivating at the possibility.

I wonder what they will use as justification?

Maybe there will be another attack on US soil. Another 'Pearl Harbot' or '9/11'.

It would be very convenient - and a boon for this administration. People would forget all about the mess in Iraq once they saw how badly attacking iran would turn out to be.

2007-07-27 03:11:43 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Yahoo quote: "The supreme reality of our time is the vulnerability of this planet."

Actual quote: "The supreme reality of our time is our indivisibility as children of God and our common vulnerability on this planet."

Pathetic, isn't it?

2007-07-27 03:07:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-27 03:04:07 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

NASA shaken by sabotage, drinking claims

By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer
Fri Jul 27, 4:25 AM ET



CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - America's space agency was shaken Thursday by two startling and unrelated reports: One involved claims that astronauts were drunk before flying. The other was news from NASA itself that a worker had sabotaged a computer set for delivery to the international space station.

It was just another jolt for an operation that has had a rocky year from the start, beginning with the arrest of an astronaut accused of attacking a rival in a love triangle.

"It's going to shake up the world, I'll tell you that," retired NASA executive Seymour Himmel said of the latest news. "There will be congressional hearings that you will not be able to avoid."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070727/ap_on_re_us/nasa_woes

2007-07-27 03:02:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not sure what offices I can (realistically) run for or who I would need to talk to to get the ball rolling.

2007-07-27 03:01:35 · 10 answers · asked by Stoic fool 2

2007-07-27 02:57:35 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

Should it matter which government is more 'friendly' with the US, or which country has more business ties to America?

2007-07-27 02:57:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

indian politics best suitable person minimum qulification graduate completion,only one marriage,maximum two childs,age below 30 above 60,dont develop his child for politics these are all main points

2007-07-27 02:50:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

GMU is a public university, will we need every major religion represented on campus's now with religous edifices? Seems to me that seperation of church and state rulings should supersede such an act!

2007-07-27 02:44:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

"God speaks through me,"...July 16, 2004...George W. Bush, Jr.

2007-07-27 02:43:12 · 32 answers · asked by Thomas B 3

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.

The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:

1. Liberals

2. Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.

2007-07-27 02:38:51 · 15 answers · asked by Richard Cranium 3

What's the difference between them?

Republic is like the british conservative, and democratic is like our labour party, right?

2007-07-27 02:18:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://thehill.com/cover-stories/the-50-most-beautiful-people-on-capitol-hill---top-10-2007-07-24.html

I guess Brad doesn't look bad.

2007-07-27 02:16:32 · 11 answers · asked by Page 4

These are the issues that will influence my vote for anyone running for president. Please provide links with your responses that show proof of his stance or commitments. This could include prior votes, speeches or funding.

1) Prolife or Abortion - includes partial birth
2) US Constitutional Right to Bear Arms - for protection, not just hunting.
3) Rewarding illegal aliens with legal citizenship
4) Border Security or Open Border
5) Socialized Medicine
6) Increasing Social Welfare Benefits funded by increased taxes
7) Regulating or Limiting Freedom of Speech in Newspapers, TV, Radio, Internet
8) Freedom of Religion - includes the right to pray in public

2007-07-27 02:13:23 · 5 answers · asked by Naturescent 4

2007-07-27 02:10:31 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

This question is for the libs being that they are more familiar with the two.

2007-07-27 02:09:49 · 11 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

2007-07-27 02:06:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Don't you think its very curious why they are never even asked the hard, important questions?

The debate showcased an assortment of the most unproductive questions I’ve ever heard, such as telling us who their favorite teacher was as a child, and spending far too much time letting them prance down memory lane. Those questions belong on a human-interest talk show interview, not on a national debate. They were a colossal misuse of time, with no bearing on who is fit to lead America.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/KenBlackwell/2007/07/27/curiouser_and_curiouser

2007-07-27 02:00:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

So why in the world would someone support the same type of individual for president and not someone who made it on their own merits?

2007-07-27 01:50:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

You can check any of the several Pew or BBC global polls on the subject. I happen to side with the majority on this.

2007-07-27 01:45:15 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous