English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 27 July 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

I am seriously let down. I never meant to offend anyone. I just found out about this 9/11 truth, and yes it upset me. These individual have made valid points and do present a good case for themselves. If there was some frame of time that they did answer these questions with factual information I was unaware and don’t understand why the individuals who attacked me with such ferocity, couldn’t just educate me on these facts. And Lady Shondra "troll"? I am not seeking attention. I was just made aware recently of such allegations and was honestly looking for genuine answers in which I feel all people own and have the right to exercise. If offense is the only seed that was born out of this than I apologize. But again my intensions were only to be informed never to be attacked and instantly labeled and categorized as a nutjob, and quite frankly it makes me wonder that if anyone ever voices a concern about they’re government than this how they will be treated? Dont you feel its our duty2ask?

2007-07-27 09:26:17 · 15 answers · asked by Stimulant 1

isreal can steal, occupy, bulldoze, embezzle and imprison but still call itself a "victim"...the jews have killed journalists, ambulance drivers and activists, like terrorists do

2007-07-27 09:21:53 · 11 answers · asked by Robert A 1

Doesn't that go against what you claim to be?

2007-07-27 09:21:46 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

such as car insurance, house insurance, workmen's comp?
Since everyone would be covered medically, would it affect those kinds of insurance?

2007-07-27 09:18:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Take that all you PC people!

2007-07-27 09:08:33 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is simply a widespread myth. A nice summary here:

"In the 1970s, there was a book in the popular press, a few articles in popular magazines, and a small amount of scientific speculation based on the recently discovered glacial cycles and the recent slight cooling trend from air pollution blocking the sunlight. There were no daily headlines. There was no avalanche of scientific articles. There were no United Nations treaties or commissions. No G8 summits on the dangers and possible solutions. No institutional pronouncements. You could find broader "consensus" on a coming alien invasion.

Quite simply, there is no comparison."

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/23/18534/222

If you don't believe this, William Connelly has made a hobby of gathering everything that was written about global cooling at the time here:

http://www.wmconnolley.org.uk/sci/iceage/

Go see for yourself. Most scientists made no predictions. Can we stop perpetrating this myth now please?

2007-07-27 08:58:24 · 27 answers · asked by Dana1981 7

when they get blamed for the next US gov't sponsored, false flag, INSIDE JOB "terror attack"?

Or will you shift into group-think and swallow the ridiculous fairytale like you did about 9/11.

2007-07-27 08:57:06 · 21 answers · asked by Crypto Jew Girl 1

2007-07-27 08:54:48 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

"The Gini coefficient is a measure of inequality of a distribution of income." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient

"A Gini index of 0 represents perfect economic equality, and 100 perfect inequality."

List of countries by income equality:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality

Go to that link, but I looked up some countries of interest:
China - 44.7
Brazil- 54
Canada- 32.6
U.S.- 40.6
South Africa - 57.8
Russia- 39.9
Sweden - 25
Japan- 24.9
France- 32.7

Well, I expected Sweden to be low and Brazil + South Africa to be high. But I didn't expect to find that we have a lesser income inequality than China. Regardless of politial beliefs, if you are unfamiliar with this statistically accurate economic index, did you actually expect China to be rated as having more economic inequality?

2007-07-27 08:51:11 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or a hardhat club?

Retarded question I know I am borrowing from an anti-individualist mouth breathing lemming AND its Friday please excuse the mess(during renovations)

2007-07-27 08:47:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

and our surpirsed when after the attack the West and cheer about it the West arrives with a military strike or attack?

Police your own felons over their and you will not have these problems.

2007-07-27 08:43:07 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Their biggest setback so far, is tryig to get the brains of liberal Democrats to accept any kind of brain cells above the waistline.

2007-07-27 08:39:40 · 8 answers · asked by big j 5

Why are schools required to show the movie to students ?

If carbon dioxide levels went from 300-370, but may have been 700 before the last ice age because the samples only go back 70,000 years, why is this significant ?

If carbon dioxide is the biggest factor of the 1 degree climate change during the past 200 years , why did more than 60 % of the warming occur before the increased levels of Co2 ?

If the tide lines on the Florida coast haven't changed since the Spanish land deeds were drawn in the 1600's why did the movie show most of the earth flooded ?

Why did the graphs on the movie have no numbers ?

Why was the Sahara Desert used as an example when the climate hasn't changed for thousands of years ?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/390097.stm

2007-07-27 08:37:57 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Apart from the million lives lost in Iraq and Afghanistan (note I have expanded the estimate from 180,000 to 240,000 to 650,000 to 850,000, because my clear thinking enables me to), Innocent people really need to worry as Government Agencies falsify, create evidence to link people to 'terrorism'?
There is tremendous evidence of a multitude of people who have been falsely imprisoned, isn't there? I mean...the link is clear, is it not?

There is ample evidence in todays world to make any clear thinker highly pessimistic, like me.

2007-07-27 08:36:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070727/ap_on_go_co/congress_gonzales

I mean, isn't an accusation of a member of Congress about a cabinet member sufficient to impeach the President? Thats a high crime, isn't it?

There is ample evidence in todays world to make any clear thinker highly pessimistic, like me.

2007-07-27 08:36:13 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's over-played and starting to get flat out corny. Especially since they are equals and can succeed just as much as a white person if they're willing to do so (If not more, because of affirmative action and forced diversity)

2007-07-27 08:30:17 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do. Some little boy asked a question about Hillary Clinton's political experience and he seemed to think being Senator of New York was all she had. Her whole career has been in politics, so I think she has the experience.

I'm a Ron Paul supporter by the way.

2007-07-27 08:28:29 · 31 answers · asked by ? 6

And how great has the Bush family involvement been in the military industrial complex since the first world war?

2007-07-27 08:19:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

$4 million?
Is she planning to have everyone be under for-profit HMO Healthcare? Is that what she means by Univeral Healthcare?

2007-07-27 08:16:19 · 9 answers · asked by Incognito 5

Thank you for your message regarding the surveillance of American citizens by the National Security Agency (NSA). I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue and share your concerns. Protecting both the security and the freedom of the American people is among my greatest priorities. I share an obligation with my fellow senators to ensure that the federal government protects and defends the people of the United States while preserving the civil liberties that have helped make the United States the greatest and most enduring democracy in the world. President Bush has stated that he authorized the NSA to conduct warrantless wiretapping of communications made by American citizens living within the United States.

2007-07-27 08:13:39 · 4 answers · asked by avail_skillz 7

Regardless if you’re Dem or Rep, you have to admit, she’s ALL special interest. Isn’t it about time we chose a president that was more than just a long list of special interest donations?

2007-07-27 08:08:38 · 14 answers · asked by Incognito 5

2007-07-27 08:07:37 · 10 answers · asked by The Peach King 1

Conservatives...do YOU consider libs as "Progressives"??..if not, what?

Liberals like to think of themselves as "progressives," which is not only a euphemism to avoid the stigma attached to "liberal," but is intended to convey that they are a step ahead of conservatives -- socially, culturally, morally and, not least, intellectually. But have you ever noticed at a presidential debate, like the one last Monday, the types of questions these "progressives" in the audience ask of Democratic candidates, or the types of predictable, vacuous answers they applaud?
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DavidLimbaugh/2007/07/27/saying_what_progressives_want_to_hear

2007-07-27 08:07:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers