2007-07-27 08:12:28 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No silly! Increased chatter is all you need.
2007-07-27 08:19:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. What they really need is an uprising. If there were violent insurrection, that would be sufficient justification to declare a long-standing state of martial law, which could then be rolled over into some sort of military coup or fascist takeover.
2007-07-27 08:21:17 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How sad that you choose to blame America, and actually believe Americans would do that, rather than blame the real culprits and those who commit terrorism around the world.
I supposed we were behind the Madrid train bombings? The savage attacks in Russia in that school and the theater? The attempted London bombings recently?
Boy with all the people that must have been involved with the 9/11 conspiracy, from the demolitions guys to the people faking phone traffic, and people planting wreckage at the Pentagon, you would think one of them would repent and confess, or get drunk and brag about it by now.
2007-07-27 08:16:42 · answer #3 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Hurricane Katrina was just a dry-run for martial law!
Remember when they was going door to door, slamming people on the floor and taking their guns?
The next big disaster (whether it be a false-flag or some other kind of natural disaster) will be a precursor to declare martial law.
Didn't Bush here just recently give himself executive powers to declare martial law anytime he seen fit?
Oh yes, I think he did!!
2007-07-27 08:32:26 · answer #4 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What?
You assume the government has a goal of enacting martial law. Care to provide some factual evidence for that assumption? You have none? What a surprise! I'm just devastated. (Sarcasm--if you didn't pick up on it.)
2007-07-27 08:17:42 · answer #5 · answered by Merissa F 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Since they haven't staged a first one, and they could have easily installed Martial Law on 9/11 if that was the goal and they didn't. I'm saying no.
2007-07-27 08:15:54 · answer #6 · answered by wizjp 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
nobody staged a terrorist attack, get over it. Why would they need to enact martial law? there is no reason for it it is not like people are rioting in the streets over the war.
2007-07-27 08:15:21 · answer #7 · answered by JJ 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
My, my, looks like someone let one of the inmates at the psychiatric ward sneak onto a computer.
Go back to your room and take your meds dear. You don’t want to get into another nasty fight with the orderlies do you? Remember what happened last time?
2007-07-27 08:26:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, we would have to be under attack, although I question your 'statement'.
Will you come back and apologize when our new President goes into office in '09?
2007-07-27 08:18:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course they do, the religious right needs martial law to impose their" values" on the rest of us....i fear for our grandchildren
2007-07-28 05:11:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There she is. One of my best tin foil fez (made from the world's finest foil)customers,everybody! How'd you like the latest waterproof one just in time for summertime frolicking at the beach.
2007-07-27 08:16:41 · answer #11 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋