Politics - 16 July 2007

I think this is an interesting question because there would be huge ramifications for any result of a situation.

Would we want to have at trial for Bin Laden? Wouldn't that be the most civil way to deal with someone who has tried to detroy CIVILization?

If we killed him, however, he would be a martyr, and that would cause all sorts of anger against us.

But if we took him alive, there would still be anger.

What do you think?

What would you want to see happen if this situation occurred?

2007-07-16 14:41:41 · 29 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

You need to read this article to really grasp it....
http://physics911.net/nuclearfalseflag

2007-07-16 14:40:50 · 17 answers · asked by Honey Girl 3

Do you if so here goes, I'm actually an insecure phucktard who doesn't have a clue about how life works. As a result I resort to childish, infantile behaviour hoping to get noticed, also If my life sucks why shouldn't I try my best to make yours miserable as well.

I hate looking in the mirror, my junk is like a babies in size and I've NECER been with a woman, I can't think for myself, I must follow in lock step to those I think have power because they sure seem smarter than me, Wow that felt good to get off my chest, carry on

2007-07-16 14:39:14 · 4 answers · asked by John B.. 1

2007-07-16 14:34:47 · 17 answers · asked by eldude 5

you voted for the Bush/Cheney ticket? Before you start blasting me for bashing the President and Vice President I suggest reading the article. Anyone familiar with my posts knows I don't post crap. I think it's to everyones best interests to be informed.
http://hnn.us/articles/18668.html

2007-07-16 14:30:18 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

This post isn't for the conservatives. This is for the liberals who actually love this country. Judgements will be made for original thoughts and in the spirit of tolerance there shall be no bashing involved in this. This is straight up original stuff.

2007-07-16 14:26:35 · 12 answers · asked by Wild Ape 4

2007-07-16 14:17:28 · 19 answers · asked by eldude 5

Just wondering when the pro-war hawks are going to "support" our troops for real.

2007-07-16 14:15:30 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

We've already known that the majority of the hijackers on 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia.. Now a new study shows that 45% of who we're fighting in Iraq are also from Saudi Arabia. How come there's so much talk about Iran, Syria, N. Korea.. But the Saudi's are never mentioned.. Isn't it obvious that their population is our biggest threat?

http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0WTTkp9FpxGknEA3BnQtDMD;_ylu=X3oDMTBjcXBoZjEwBHBvcwMzBHNlYwNzcg--/SIG=13ias2aht/EXP=1184720893/**http%3a//timesofindia.indiatimes.com/45_of_jehadis_in_Iraq_from_S_Arabia/articleshow/2208989.cms

Quote from the article- "About 45% of all foreign militants targeting US security forces and Iraqi civilians are from Saudi Arabia, compared with 15% from Syria and Lebanon, the Los Angeles Times reported on Monday."

2007-07-16 14:13:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

According to a recent article in the Guardian (a Brit paper), Washington sources have indicated that Bush is once more siding with Cheney and the neocons, who want that war.

If you do not think Bush will pull the trigger, let us know why. If you think he will, why and when.

I'd guess he will, as the neocons still have great power and Bush may figure his "legacy" can't be any worse. And sometime in December or January, before the first presidential caucuses and primaries. In the first months of a new war the populace usually vigorously supports the war party. Good news for McCain, perhaps.

2007-07-16 14:01:16 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 14:00:59 · 14 answers · asked by Ronnie 2

We need someone here to keep us competative with China, India, and other places where the average wage equals a cup of coffee. By having more Guest Workers, we can lower expectations and increase likelyhood of companies deciding not to move to Mongolia but keep their factories open here.

2007-07-16 13:55:15 · 7 answers · asked by St. Toad 4

do u really think muslims are terrorists?
if so why?
what do u think of arabs ,muslims or christians?
what do u think of their countries,culture
and what do u think of the war between america and the arabs?
is it a fair war?
just say ur opinion freelyi am a muslim and an arab and i would like 2 know what people really think of us?

2007-07-16 13:55:08 · 16 answers · asked by doly 3

Lousisana State Rep;

2007-07-16 13:41:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Although Barrack Hussein Obama is a nominal Christian (He attends a Christian church, but declines to declare the divinity of Christ,) he does have family roots in Islam. As a potential President of the U.S., leading our nation in The War of Islamic Fundamentalism vs. The World, could his Islamic heritage be a conflict of interest or could he have ambiguous loyalties?

2007-07-16 13:40:24 · 25 answers · asked by Tommy B 6

The gov't told you to evacuate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't blame bush, blame yourselves!!!!!!! You shouldn't deserve help if you don't leave a place where you have to evacuate!!!

2007-07-16 13:39:20 · 21 answers · asked by box778899 2

2007-07-16 13:34:58 · 10 answers · asked by eldude 5

2007-07-16 13:34:38 · 13 answers · asked by jazz_devotee 2

China has shown rapid economic growth in the race to find economic wealth and status but when people do business with China, who really wins?

2007-07-16 13:32:08 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 13:25:34 · 26 answers · asked by no idea 3

Cheney's been pressing Bush hard for sometime now to hit Iran, while Condi seems to want more of the diplomatic approach. Bush seems to be leaning more on Cheney's side to hit Iran. Why isn't that surprising to anyone who hears it? Could it be that Bush is anxious to bomb a country who doesn't pose an immediate threat to us? Now, didn't we already do this kind of thing with Iraq, and didn't that prove to be a bad move? The Impeachment of Bush and Cheney must happen, before those two have a chance to wipe everyone else out besides the troops and contractors and Iraqi Civilians. The dictators need to go, the Constitutional values need to be restored and the people need to press Congress even harder than before that Bush and Cheney be held accountable for the actions taken against the people and the Constitution while they have served in office.

2007-07-16 13:12:27 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team_B

Rumsfeld was the point man or the press conference guy for team B. there was even the advantage of hindsight. everything about team B's findings had been proven to be completely wrong.... a fairy tale. even Time magazine was aware of it.

"According to Dr. Anne Cahn (Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, 1977-1980), Team B's analysis of weapons systems was later proven to be false. "I would say that all of it was fantasy... if you go through most of Team B's specific allegations about weapons systems, and you just examine them one by one, they were all wrong."

2007-07-16 13:11:46 · 8 answers · asked by gherd 4

2007-07-16 13:10:15 · 7 answers · asked by koolj 2

My favorite on the Right: John Gibbson
My favorite on the Left: Ed Shultz

Just to let you know, I'm on the hard conservative Right

2007-07-16 13:06:10 · 18 answers · asked by vinny_says_relax 7

and what are their conflicts?

2007-07-16 12:54:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you think it does take a look at the following links and consider calling your Senators - the vote on the bill to reverse the most egregious parts of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 could come as soon as tomorrow.

Basically the Act passed last year just days before the 2006 election may allow the President or Secretary of Defense to declare whoever they want to be an "illegal combatant" and be jailed indefinitely - including american citizens.

Conservatives - regardless of your view please consider this: You run the risk of Hillary or another Democrat having this power unless this bill passes the Senate. Personally I don't want anyone on either side having this kind of extreme control over us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/opinion/15sun1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=679&pg=makeACall&JServSessionIdr011=aai7bx1p03.app26a

2007-07-16 12:49:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Senator Harry Reid is vowing that they stay up all night to debate about an end to the Iraq War. By doing this they hope to persuade more Republican Senators to get on board about voting for an end to the occupation in Iraq. Who will cave in after missing one night of sleep? They are not used to being without rest. Our soldiers get put through so much more and don't sleep too well. Who in Congress will cave after missing one night of sleep?

2007-07-16 12:48:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

You think maybe that's exactly what those in power want? For us to be so distracted with bashing each other that we don't realize they're all basically the same? Because they're so preoccupied with getting our popular vote they mold in to what they think we want, corrupting their true ideals. Who's really running this country?

2007-07-16 12:46:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 12:46:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm an independent, but still haven't forgiven the charlatan.

2007-07-16 12:45:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous