2007-07-16 13:25:34 · 26 answers · asked by no idea 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nope, the act is to connect to 'average' Americans...
2007-07-16 13:29:29 · answer #1 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
George W Bush does not need to act stupid, he was born stupid.
2007-07-18 23:39:05 · answer #2 · answered by Victor E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure, as long as there is one member of the militia in Iraq who believes we'd desire to continually be there, and as long as we've an analogous form of terrorist assaults after 9/11 right here interior the U.S. as we now have. And his "acts" weren't stupid, whether he did fail to place the appropriate human beings in administration of the militia, enormously interior the Intelligence community. That alleycat who preceded him became a lot worse. If he became enjoying heads-up ball, 9/11 in no way might have got here approximately. inspite of each little thing, he had 8 years to keep away from an connect and build our militia forces. Bush had 8 months.
2016-10-03 23:19:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really do not think that anyone gets elected 2x to the Presidency if they are that stupid. Perhaps his speech is not as eloquent as some, but his actions, off camera, speak loads.
He came to our region, several times after the Hurricane and you could see the integrity and ethics in his eyes. He would turn the camera off to sit with those who lost everything and put his arm around them to comfort them. Most President's would have used that as a photo op. I admire him for that.
That is not to say that I agree with everything that he has done, but then again, he is human and I have not agreed with everything that any of our President's have done.
As stated before, I can only image how unpopular Lincoln was during the civil war when all of our people were dying on the battle field in our land. However, now he is revered as being a "leader" and one of the best President's we have ever had.
Charisma should not be the determiner when voting. It's my understanding that Hitler was very Charismatic. And I do not think that his legacy is one of admiration.
2007-07-16 13:55:31 · answer #4 · answered by bck2liberty 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What ever he is, he's not stupid. More importantly he's the front man for a lagre multi billion dollar organisation that seeks to control the world's most powerful economy
2007-07-16 21:23:23 · answer #5 · answered by Seán O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ACT? Fecking ACT?
The guy is stupid, how the feck he got the vote, gawd only knows!
if there was an Oscar award for acting-but i do not give a frig- POLITICIANS, it would be a very close vote between him and Blaire!
2007-07-16 13:31:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If he's acting he deserves a frigging Oscar! No one could act that stupid, well maybe Dustin Hoffman in "Rainman".
2007-07-16 13:39:05 · answer #7 · answered by old man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's an interesting question. See, I'm the guy - I'm the question-answering guy. I have to answer the questions. And that means that it's me that has to do that. And that's important. Somebody has to do it, and it's me. So I take that on. And I mean what I say when I do the question answering. Somebody has to. And it's me. So I do it. And that matters.
2007-07-16 14:03:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't ACT Stupid.. he Is just STUPID......
2007-07-16 13:32:51 · answer #9 · answered by Ninja by night...... 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, He does not know that he's acting or looking stupid.
2007-07-16 13:29:33 · answer #10 · answered by Sugar 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's part of his act, yes.
The whole folksy cowboy thing is intended to create a image that allows him to act and respond in a particular way.
2007-07-16 13:28:14 · answer #11 · answered by coragryph 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋