Politics - 16 July 2007

every i go we treated wrong with disrepspect

2007-07-16 09:10:16 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

You must choose one of these three or be branded a cad.

2007-07-16 09:07:45 · 3 answers · asked by fourthy27 2

2007-07-16 09:01:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Apparently in the liberal world, loyalty to one's country means to bash, criticize, undermine and discredit whenever possible. All the world's ills must be traced back to the USA and it's embrace of free markets. So how is that Loyalty? Counterintuitive, isn't it?

The liberal will claim that their criticism is a form of patriotsm, but do not be fooled. If such criticism was indeed intended to equal Loyalty, you would find Liberals criticising, for example, the poor for their own plight instead of blaming society, racism, capitalism, etc. If criticising meant loyalty, the Liberals might point out how poverty is largely a choice in the USA, and that perhaps the poor might do well to avoid crime and drugs and pre-marital childbirth. In pointing out their flaws, this would show true solidarity with the poor. But, don't hold you breath for that to happen...

But of course, as will many things, the Liberal is singing one tune while his feet are moving to another song.

2007-07-16 08:57:51 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Due to the fact that there are alot of racists in america wether you like it or not and alot of people hate muslims so i dont think Obama Osama should be president in anyway shape or form.

2007-07-16 08:57:29 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 08:55:09 · 8 answers · asked by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6

and when the oil is gone will he claim "Mission Accomplished" ?

2007-07-16 08:51:29 · 13 answers · asked by Honey Girl 3

If so what was the purpose of the meeting?

2007-07-16 08:49:35 · 9 answers · asked by RON PAUL for President 2008 2

REPUBLICAN
OR DEMOCRAT???

Vote here! --> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvXNk6C2L.J.AoOzBJUAdBrOxQt.?qid=20070716122628AA5bJUA

2007-07-16 08:42:31 · 9 answers · asked by Rick 4

2007-07-16 08:42:17 · 13 answers · asked by Dangerous 2

16 July: At least 85 die in twin bombings in Kirkuk
7 July: 130 killed in Amirli market bombing
19 June: At least 78 die in Baghdad mosque blast
18 April: Up to 200 killed in car bombings in Baghdad
29 March: At least 60 killed in double suicide bombing in Baghdad market
6 March: At least 90 killed in double suicide bombing in Hilla
3 Feb: At least 130 die in suicide truck bombing in Baghdad
22 Jan: 88 killed in Baghdad car bombings
when this will end? why people have to die this way?
Who need to be blamed? Why the world is simply watching these killings in horror and not doing anything? What exactly we can do now to stop this mindless voilence? Is all the leaders of the world and the United Nations are useless? Are they not ashamed on their silence? why not even the Arab nations and their forum like Arab league could not come forward to stop this atrocious killings? Is there no Muslim leaders of the world could do something about this? Cant they appeal?

2007-07-16 08:34:25 · 13 answers · asked by anjana 6

2007-07-16 08:31:42 · 26 answers · asked by John S2005 3

The strategies of war...

2007-07-16 08:27:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

and who has the biggest stockpile of wmd's? I thought agent orange and mustard gas were considered wmd's as well as large impact cluster bombs.

2007-07-16 08:17:18 · 18 answers · asked by bbbbriggs04 3

Many people quote "scientific" fact for evolution, global warming, abortion, etc... But if the general public is unable to verify these results themselves, then in affect, isn't using secondary source (not you) "scientific evidence" to back up something you say simply an appeal to authority or an appeal to tradition? If "90%" of the world scientists say it's true, isn't this an appeal to the mass?

Someone said I was not a man of science because I did not believe something a scientist said. This seems contradictory, at least...

2007-07-16 08:17:15 · 9 answers · asked by nom de paix 4

2007-07-16 08:15:01 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 08:14:31 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 08:11:15 · 25 answers · asked by Dangerous 2

A liberal web site by the name of Media Matters which was a big contributor to the firing of Imus is now going after another Radio Talk Show personality who opposes their view on Global Warming.

Glenn Beck had a CNN special on Global Warming with the disclaimer, "This is not a balanced look at global warming. It is the other side of the climate debate that you don't hear anywhere. Yes, Al Gore, there is another credible side."

Now, this is HIS show in which he should have the RIGHT within government regulations to show what he pleases. The special was done incredibly well sighting information by very reputable scientists and climatologists.

What is Media Matters so worried about? Why do they feel the need shut down any opposing view? Talk about trampling on the constitution and freedom of speech.

Wouldn't it be a good thing to look at ALL of the information out there?

2007-07-16 08:06:04 · 31 answers · asked by Mr. Perfect 5

Or that it would pass?

What a joke. Taxing is one of the greatest ways to influence social policy. Plus, how many people would be put out of work?

2007-07-16 08:05:05 · 22 answers · asked by nom de paix 4

On my last quesion, (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApoAEhdabmC5ZMinbtTX1_DY7BR.?qid=20070716114156AAuvPin), Some people objected to Christians trying to tell them how to live their lives. Do you see any similarity to Liberals backing certain laws that impact the lives of others? Gun control of the law abiding citizen comes to mind, as an example of many.

2007-07-16 08:00:40 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

This would never happen in a red state!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070716/od_nm/germany_sexy_dc;_ylt=Ahrar5sS6.qLaFe5BS9M5sbMWM0F

2007-07-16 07:51:24 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've been waiting for the Iraqi govt to say please go now. I read in the paper that Malaki says we can leave any time we want. OK it's not please go now. But it's very close

I've been for our staying as long as we were wanted by the government of Iraq. And frankly I wish we could have done more for them. The Iraqis had to put up with Saddam for --way too long. They have indicated they think they can handle the job now. Should we get out of Dodge before they change their minds?

2007-07-16 07:47:47 · 15 answers · asked by namsaev 6

After cleaning up Jimmy Cater's mess I think he qualifies.

2007-07-16 07:44:51 · 37 answers · asked by Sonny 3

2007-07-16 07:44:36 · 19 answers · asked by Supercell 5

I see alot of people from the left bashing Christians on here, so it makes me wonder.
I also find it interesting that they seem to hate Christians more than the lslamofacists who would like nothing more than to cut off the liberals heads, while they are still alive, and post the video on the internet.

2007-07-16 07:41:56 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

Especially if they are highly vocal about how Democrats who are caught in a sex scandal are not fit to hold office?

2007-07-16 07:33:05 · 22 answers · asked by wooper 5

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_6378604

I don't think it is, because no matter what their situation is, they are criminals.

Also I read somewhere that other houses of worship, like synagogues are doing the same.


Your thoughts.

2007-07-16 07:21:35 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-16 07:19:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is that why so many RedsStaters hate what education has done to America.

2007-07-16 07:17:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous