Politics (Politics & Government) - 11 November 2006

Don't you wish some on the left/right, and even some independents, understood the historical insensitivity of using labels like Fascist and Nazi to describe others and their behavior? How is it they are blind to seeing how asinine it makes them look when they use those labels to malign others? Have the words really lost that much meaning?

2006-11-11 10:14:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

24 ⤊

If the 9/11 conspiracies are true, as some contend, then why did the government allow people to discover them?

If the government is willing to kill 3000 citizens, wouldn't they just kill people exposing their secret?

2006-11-11 10:13:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

8 ⤊

Do you think it would benifit America to watch Bush go on trial?

Though there are no crimes he has committed, there is much talk of impeachment on here. Lets just say he was taken into an impeachment trial. Do you think it would help America stay safe from terrorists and fix all our problems to try him like this? Yes or no, and explain why.

2006-11-11 10:06:51 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

5 ⤊

Did the whitehouse dump Rumsfeld because of the warcrimes trials?

Friday night's 6 o'clock news stated that in Germany the United Nations is pursuing charges against Don Rumsfeld for his knowledge and approval of the atrocities of Abu Grahb (sp, sorry).

2006-11-11 10:05:45 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

1 ⤊

When can we get our $ back from Arafat's wife (Suha Arafat), living in Paris?

Former Palistinian dictator, Yasar Arafat, was quite rich -- thanks to money coming through the UN no doubt. That money comes partly from the US. A lot of it went to Suha Arafat, his wife, living in Paris. I want it back, now!

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0A13FD385E0C718DDDAB0894DC404482&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fA%2fArafat%2c%20Suha

http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=2147

2006-11-11 10:02:58 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

12 ⤊

Will Cheney/Bush stand up for Rumsfeld through his warcrimes trial?

2006-11-11 09:59:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

4 ⤊

Do you think Rumsfeld will "beat the rap" on his warcrimes trial?

2006-11-11 09:57:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

25 ⤊

If Bush approached you, would you have enough respect to shake his hand?

2006-11-11 09:47:09 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

3 ⤊

the yahoo answers people called me and wanted to touch me?

they said it was cause they are liberal, why?

2006-11-11 09:46:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

18 ⤊

Would Michael Moore or W Bush make a better president?

If W could run for a 3rd, of course

2006-11-11 09:40:08 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

8 ⤊

If Bush would have fired Rumsfeld two weeks before the elections ?

Do you think it would have made a difference on the outcome ?

2006-11-11 09:17:23 · 12 answers · asked by kman1830 5

7 ⤊

Just out of curiosity?

Why do we (the US) still have troops in the Phillipines, S. Korea, and Japan? I can understand the S. Korea one because of the North Koreans, but what is with the rest of them? Can we not take them out? Everything seems stable in Japan

2006-11-11 09:03:56 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

9 ⤊

why has it come to the point where being a patriotic american is a bad thing?

2006-11-11 08:53:26 · 14 answers · asked by wojopolack 1

16 ⤊

Bush is probably the worst president we've had since Jimmy Carter?

Bush is far from charismatic. Nearly every speech I've listened to he makes up a word or uses a word incorrectly. Sometimes he makes absolutely no sense at all. He smiles when he’s talking about something serious and doesn’t use complete sentences when answering questions. I don’t know the man personally. Maybe he gets nervous in public. Maybe he’s very articulate behind closed doors, but from what I’ve seen he is an awful public speaker.

Iraq was a huge mistake. We didn’t find WMD’s and it turns out that the only thing the Iraq people hate more then Sadam was the USA. We found little to no evidence that Iraq was involved in terrorism. But now the place is so full of terrorist we can’t leave. Every day our troops are dying. If we leave the country spirals into a terrorist haven, if we stay we will continue to lose lives and money.

2006-11-11 08:49:35 · 25 answers · asked by Return Of Buckwheat 1

4 ⤊

what really happend at uncle toms cabin?

did al gore invent the internet there?

2006-11-11 08:46:16 · 7 answers · asked by TARD 1

11 ⤊

Hillary Clinton the future president of the White House?

Hillary Clinton goes to be the future president of the White House it has a very strong personality and is the woman certain to give of new the great name that is America at this moment u.s.a has the name spotted the black color everything for a politica badly lead by the current president alone the Hillary Clinton is the person certain to raise the nation and to give of new credibility to the country is therefore that it is important to vote and to support the democratic ones.

2006-11-11 08:39:18 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

5 ⤊

#3 Both sides agree terrorism is a problem, now what do we do about it?

"economic disparity, imperialism, and religious obscurantism are what drive people to terrorism--to eliminate it, we must eliminate these things, otherwise we will always have it"

Extreme economic disparity - I don't see how we can address that now.

Imperialism - ditto

Religious Obscurantism - For all intents and purposes impossible.

2006-11-11 08:29:30 · 9 answers · asked by notme 5

4 ⤊

Haaa, why it is every time someone throws a question out here about should the President be impeached..?

Theres always someone who answers with an answer, in comparison to Clinton.......lol............????????????????

2006-11-11 08:27:54 · 5 answers · asked by Humor me.. 3

14 ⤊

US VETO. And people still wonder why the world hates the US. Why did the US use the VETO?

Today the USA used the VETO against a resolution that condemns a massacre of the Palestinians on the hands of the Isrealies. For god sake... a VETO on only condemning the massacre. I am wondering why did the US use the VETO?

2006-11-11 08:25:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

5 ⤊

#2 Both sides agree terrorism is a problem, now what do we do about it?

"all states must compromise about not selling weapons to terrorists. if there is no weapons, there will no war"

Agreed by me. What if we create Goals?

Goal #1 - Prevent terrorists from obtaining arms.

2006-11-11 08:25:12 · 11 answers · asked by notme 5

3 ⤊

Is not having bothered defining victory SHAMEfull ?

Is it among shamefull things America has done to it's troops ?

When they stand up, we'll stand down.
We're there just "as long as it takes".

Is this an extreemly sloppy way to define victory ?

2006-11-11 08:16:44 · 4 answers · asked by roostershine 4

Politics - 11 November 2006