Politics - 11 November 2006

"we have the same problem we have had since the usa was formed....not one percent higher...we should simply go back to the way life was before 911 otherwise they have won"

Assuming you are talking about political struggle - Your solution is to simply ignore the problem now?

I can't agree with that, it is a problem (albeit not as huge as some claim) that we are concerned with. My suggestion would be to do my #2, 3, and 4. Then perhaps if the problem isn't that large - we stop.

2006-11-11 08:16:21 · 10 answers · asked by notme 5

when sentenced to death? Are there any speakers of his language here?

2006-11-11 08:16:21 · 7 answers · asked by almostdead 4

2006-11-11 07:53:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

after all, if the Republicans who have been in total control of the government for the past 6 year have done nothing wrong then they have nothing hide. right?

isn't that one of the rationals behind the unquestioning acceptance of warentless surveilance on American citizens?

and don't the fiscally responsible Republicans want to know where the 2.04 BILLION DOLLARS A DAY of taxpayers money is going?

2006-11-11 07:52:06 · 22 answers · asked by nebtet 6

2006-11-11 07:48:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-11 07:42:08 · 16 answers · asked by kobacker59 6

Do you think if Bush knew what he knows now, that he would of changed how he presided over our counttry?

Do you think he would of appointed other officials instead of surrounding himself with the dinosaurs from Bush Sr's era?

2006-11-11 07:40:40 · 14 answers · asked by JC J 2

passed....... i mean its the logical thing to do....... clean air , if we cut off foreign oil would foreign investors withdraw their accounts and put our countries economy in turmoil?

2006-11-11 07:39:33 · 6 answers · asked by flavorlicious 2

do you base it on the persons morals, their politcal views, or do you just vote for whatever party your registered to?

2006-11-11 07:39:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just give me your opinion.

2006-11-11 07:32:19 · 9 answers · asked by bradship4u 3

I see questions here quite a lot about impeaching Bush. From the way these questions are phrased, and a lot of the answers, I don't think these people really understand what impeachment really is. So this is a little test. You are on your honor not to cheat and look up the answer, or look at the other answers that may be posted before yours. Just off the top of your head, what do you think "impeachment" means?

2006-11-11 07:21:33 · 14 answers · asked by Mutt 7

Without thinking of what political party you support,how would you define making America better?

What is the most important issues that you would like resolved in the future?

2006-11-11 07:21:15 · 9 answers · asked by JC J 2

For the last 56 years Israel conducts collective punishment and state terror against the Palestinian Refugees.For the last 56 years the Palestinian Refugees are living in a United Nation Refugee Camps waiting for UN to implement the UN Security Council resolutions.
Every time the Palestinians try to solve their problem with Israel in the UN the USA veto it the USA used its veto 33 times for Israel . Are the Americans the real enemies of Palestinian human rights or should the Palestinians take their issue to the Americans by all means What should they do to get America stand for its values time is running out for all of us peace must Perivale for all of us

2006-11-11 07:17:19 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Waxman Set to Probe Areas of Bush Administration
By Erica Werner
The Associated Press

Friday 10 November 2006

The Democratic congressman who will investigate the Bush administration's running of the government says there are so many areas of possible wrongdoing, his biggest problem will be deciding which ones to pursue.

2006-11-11 07:09:29 · 8 answers · asked by rhino9joe 5

There is an old (very old) Greek translation by an unknown person loosley translated. "It seems that if I agree with someone half of the time we have much in common-in some circles though it makes one an enemy."

2006-11-11 06:59:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-11 06:44:56 · 9 answers · asked by rebelyell 1

"US vetoes UN resolution on Gaza "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6139968.stm

What do you think about this?

2006-11-11 06:43:27 · 5 answers · asked by DAR 7

I think it's because they just don't have the iron fist that many great leaders, such as Stalin and Napoleon had. It's the anger and strength that makes a good leader.

2006-11-11 06:32:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here is what I think should be done;

1. Protect the US first. Cover the borders and ports to deny entry to those who intend to do us harm, and materials which can be used to harm us within the framework of the law.
2. Identify and rebuild co-operation and trust with countries and groups who abhor terrorism and the taking of innocent life.
3. Build information databases on known terrorists, and those who aid them.
4. Share that information with those who we reasonably feel abide by international law, and invite them to add information or dispute information they feel is wrong.
5. Make binding agreements with them to act jointly or independently as necessary on information we both agree is correct.

Thoughtfully detailed answers appreciated.

I will ask more questions on this subject as I have time available based on _reasonable_ answers given, with the intent of continuing the discussion.

2006-11-11 06:27:26 · 15 answers · asked by notme 5

2006-11-11 06:16:30 · 9 answers · asked by Luis 4

please don't say hillary clinton :0

2006-11-11 06:10:23 · 11 answers · asked by pfr305 3

Islam has been a religion for thousands of years, why the sudden hate towards the US?

2006-11-11 06:08:49 · 20 answers · asked by Perplexed 7

What can be more important than that?
Irak?
Iran?
Pakistan?
Cuba?
North Korea?
Israel?



?

2006-11-11 06:00:35 · 13 answers · asked by Aladino Z 2

Who would like to see a new major party formed to represent the true moderates of the country? The Democrats are going to far left and the republicans to far to the right. Wouldn't it be great to have a party that could take the good from both parties and represent our interests?

2006-11-11 05:55:58 · 11 answers · asked by Return Of Buckwheat 1

Do you think that he set it up all by himself, that he and his Saudi associates worked together, that Bush knew about it and did nothing, or that Bush really is innocent (had no idea that it would occur, or didn't know the specifics)? I can't help but think that he needed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, but I won't go into any further detail. What's everyone think?

PS - I'm neither Democrat nor Republican.

2006-11-11 05:55:16 · 31 answers · asked by Michael F 3

2006-11-11 05:49:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-11 05:48:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-11 05:48:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-11 05:47:25 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

That it will be hard for any elected leader to get alot of support in the future, because every move they make is scrutinized and analyzed, all on these 24 hour news programs, the internet and the like? Your thoughts on whether, because of these things, we'll ever have an overwhelmingly popular president again?

2006-11-11 05:45:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous