Who thinks...Not the wacko's and hate-mongers the blame America for terrorists...You don't think! You just blindly hate!
Ignorance can be corrected...There is no hope for you.
2006-11-11 06:11:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
I don't know. I hope not!!
All I can say is that we are not being told the truth!
I know that no 100 ton 757-200 which is 1/2 footballl field long, a footbal field wide and 44 feet tall, did not hit the Pentagon! We have ton's of tapes of the trades but not one single tape of a 757 at the most highly secure place in the world! If one did hit the Pentagon, the FBI only has to release one tape, which they have not done! My question is why!
3 Trades go straight down, 2 that were hit by an aircraft! They were built to withstand a hit from an aircraft and high temperatures! Both collapsed and neither had been on fire more than 1 hour! The only 2 in the history of the world!
Then there is Trade 7! That wasn't even hit and it collapsed!
No, I would like to see all those TOP SECRET documents the government has which were classified for 1 reason, to keep the information away from us! There is no National Security interest in keeping the tapes or the documents secret!
2006-11-11 06:09:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
i think there's a clean action picture out which tries to tie mutually each and all of the main significant conspiracy theories alongside with: not a airplane that hit the pentagon The towers have been offered down by ability of controlled explosions not the planes. Flight ninety 3 (?) truthfully landed on an airbase and the people have been carted away.. and so on. I examine an editorial on the two the Time or parent web pages and the tip is that its a in basic terms a conspiracy concept: the hot action picture does not truthfully interview any surveyors/explosive experts in basic terms a janitor and protection guards on the tower. (Admitedly i've got not considered the action picture). and additionally factors out the form of people who could be in touch in this kind of conspiracy... besides does all people situation that Bush would desire to truthfully orchestrate a gaggle of youngsters with triangles, not to show something that desires hundreds of people to be in touch and saved quiet! the guy probably won't be able to even spell 9/11... Hmm little bit of a rant there - yet i don't probably purchase it...
2016-10-21 22:07:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I dont believe he orchistrated it but he failed to stop it. He had all kinds of information that he felt was not important at the time. Now he wants the american people to think he is so sorrry and humbled by the 9/11 incidents. It was nothing new and he was aware that they were planning a huge attact on the US.
It is so important to BUSH to have a legacy. Go down in the History books not as just another President but a strong one who saved the US from terrorists and rid the world of Sadaam by war. He will get his place in the History books as being the worst President ever. He is causing the US bankkuptcy, the worst environment in decades, the loss of too many soldiers in war, lack of healthcare and poverty.
Cant wait for 2008.
2006-11-11 06:11:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nevada Pokerqueen 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.
FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg
EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=
Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ
FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=
In a government released video, the top profile of a small craft can be seen hiding behind a call box. Some say it resembles a U.S. military Global Hawk: Whatever it is, it is not big enough to be a Boeing 757.
http://membres.lycos.fr/applemacintosh2/Pentagon2.htm
MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
2006-11-12 04:20:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe_Pardy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Bush took advantage of the situation to go into the Middle East as he wanted to anyway, but it is entirely the terrorists fault that they opened the door to him that way. I don't thnk he knew, or wanted to know how close the terrorists were to completing their mission.
I am old enough to remember when they were building the World Trade Center, and at that time there were questions raised about its strength due to both the fact that it wasn't constructed to standard because it was a state owned building and it was a new to the day type of structure.
2006-11-11 06:17:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by justa 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm not for the war in Iraq, but I don't believe any of these moron conspiracies. Especially Michael Moore. He lied so much on that film Fahrenheit 9-11 it wasn't even funny. Hell majority of the time he was just asking questions and not even giving proof on his claims. I state my claim on actual facts not theories.
1. Saddam had no relations with the 9-11 attacks on the WTC. Bush even stated it himself http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsPSI-tcoaI
2. Saddam had no WMDs the only weapons he had were the ones givin to him by the Reagon Administration.
3. Bush had a plan on invading Iraq before he was even elected.
Conspiracy theories just make people look foolish.
2006-11-11 06:25:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
naw ... GW et al didn't orchestrate 9/11 but he and his admin ignored the warnings and the pleas from Clinton's security adviser to do something about terrorism for 8 months. GW et al surely benefited from 9/11. it was the "Pearl Harbor like event" PNAC engineers were waiting for as an opening to begin truly implementing their New World Order Unipolar agenda. Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfailed and Perle had the invasion of Iraq well planned long in advance of GW being installed in the Whitehouse.
2006-11-11 06:15:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by nebtet 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Conspiracy theories are not just made up out of the blue. People who can put 2 and 2 together can see the bigger picture.
why would bush himself, come out of the blue, to tell the people, not to believe conspiracy theories. Bush wouldn't have orchastrated it by himself.
That was exactly their goal - to get people to think that conspiracy theorist are quacks, so that no one will listen to them. But there will always be those, who will think for themselves. The ones who refuse to think inside the box, and live inside the box.
Most people have not even asked the questions needed to see the bigger picture, and will just accept whatever facts put in front of them. You would have thought, by the way the investigation took place after 9/11, that mere rookies with out an education had done the research, but in reality there were mountains of contradictions and lies. People who lie can not speak with out contradictions.
Certain people were called the day of 9/11 and told not to go to the world trade centers that day. So they lived. The evidence that something is fishy is astounding, and it is unbelievable.
The definition of insanity, is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. It is also called denial, a pattern of believing what will keep us able to function with out worry of the reality that we live in, and so shifting the responsibility of our own welfare on to those who make the BIG decisions, about what our futures will amount to.
2006-11-11 06:28:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by chara 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
First than all, leave the guy alone, this is a website to answer questions not to attack those who ask the questions.
Second, thought I do not believe in the conspirancy theory that says Bush did it, we all must recognize that it was pretty convenient for this government that 9/11 took place.
We know they don't mind about the human lives on the people otherwise they wouldn't be so calmed while 3000 US Soldiers and more than 10.000 iraquies have died in the name of this war.
So, summarizing, while I do not think they were involved, we must recognize that without the powers given to this administration after 9/11 this administration wouldn't be able to do much, if anything at all.
2006-11-11 06:10:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by santapatita 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
To answer your question just go back and look at Bushs face when he was sitting in that school room. It was a look of oh crap they actually did it. I do not think Bush did it himself. I think he is a puppet President put up by people who really control this country. I do not care how crazy that sounds, I have taken alot of flak for thinking that and I wont stop thinking it just because someone here disagrees. I put alot of time into studying the history of our country, the banking system, the previous wars, oil, discovery of oil in the middle east. 9-11 had to happen. No way around it.
2006-11-11 06:05:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
5⤊
2⤋