Politics - 11 November 2006

2006-11-11 23:57:54 · 3 answers · asked by sara_bouchik 1

cards this year?

I'm sure our soldiers and their families are still reeling with joy about being compared to Nazis, illiterates, and Pol Pot's boys.

2006-11-11 23:28:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

who hates sadam and who thinks he does deseve death

2006-11-11 23:17:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

priviledge, since we must spend billions on foregion aide and wars abroad?

2006-11-11 23:11:02 · 14 answers · asked by paulisfree2004 6

2006-11-11 23:03:15 · 14 answers · asked by ofthehighest 1

2006-11-11 22:59:52 · 11 answers · asked by ofthehighest 1

2006-11-11 22:57:46 · 9 answers · asked by ofthehighest 1

Pls it's urgent.I need a specific information about Che's deeds, his revolution and his work.If u can give me a link or write sth usefull 10points are yours.
Thank u in advance

2006-11-11 22:42:51 · 6 answers · asked by kiki 2

Even if we can't rid ourselves of the current incumbent in the White House, why not at least a few more of his fellow incompetents?

2006-11-11 22:17:21 · 7 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4

2006-11-11 21:53:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

that will make this world a safer place ?..

2006-11-11 21:30:17 · 7 answers · asked by serene 1

This could be a very strong power economically,politically,geographycally,militarilly,religeouslly

2006-11-11 21:05:57 · 7 answers · asked by qwine2000 5

Mr. Gam Bar Ri, second sectary of UN do not care really for politics of Myanmar? he is so useless, evil and bad and i have complete contempt for him and UN is very very very very very bad

He deserve to die and go to hell.

2006-11-11 20:48:26 · 6 answers · asked by free aung san su kyi forthwith 2

2006-11-11 19:35:19 · 17 answers · asked by buffalobo 2

degenerate, pedophile concealing republicans were finally and thankfully booted out of congressional control?

2006-11-11 19:19:05 · 14 answers · asked by Pie's_Guy 6

2006-11-11 19:18:26 · 10 answers · asked by bernard t 1

An obscure provision in a huge military authorization bill(H.R.5122) that President George W. Bush recently signed terminates the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction.

The clause has generated surprise and some outrage among lawmakers who say they had no idea it was in the final legislation.

The federal oversight agency, led by Republican lawyer Stuart W. Bowen Jr., has sent U.S. officials to jail on bribery and conspiracy charges, exposed disastrously poor construction work by well-connected companies like Cheneys Halliburton Co. and Parsons Iraq Joint Venture, and discovered that the military did not properly track hundreds of thousands of weapons it shipped to Iraqi security forces.

Whats the benefit from disbanding the last office charged with exposing corruption in Iraq?

2006-11-11 19:18:17 · 3 answers · asked by big-brother 3

2006-11-11 18:53:40 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Im thinking a gradual shrinking of funds given to the Mercenary companies which will force a drawdown and eventual end.......?

2006-11-11 18:48:28 · 5 answers · asked by elisioloyd 2

We would not have to work anymore. We can get welfare checks!!!

2006-11-11 18:44:43 · 5 answers · asked by james w 3

Who was the best democrat President and who was the best republican President? According to each partys opinion.

2006-11-11 18:40:08 · 17 answers · asked by hey, be a decent human being 2

Every news outlet, liberal and conservative, in the country is recommending it as " Required Viewing By ALL Americans ".

CNN even 'praised' Fox News for running an hour-long preview.

If you haven't heard of it or seen it. . . .. GO SEE IT. . . . . .and then

" Get Ready to Pick your Jaw Up Off the Ground ".

2006-11-11 18:33:45 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

ALL GOVERMENTS ! if mankind destroys itself it will be a religious war of some type

2006-11-11 18:30:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-11 18:20:39 · 4 answers · asked by mimi A 1

2006-11-11 18:07:44 · 9 answers · asked by xiphias 1

California's Proposition 83, which passed by a margin of 70 percent to 30 percent, requires convicted felony sex offenders to be monitored by GPS for life.
http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/props/prop83/analysis83.html

Bill O'Reilly wont stop touting this idea. But Iam flat-out against this.

I think felony sex offenders belong in prison. A GPS is not a physical crime-stopping barrier, It wont prevent crime especially since they use "passive" tracking, which produces reports about where offenders have been, not where they are.

There are plenty of petty drug offenders in our jails. Why dont we let them out and put the rapists back in instead of tagging them like sheep to walk among us?

I understand why California voters passed this, they want action. But doesnt this go to far without really solving the problem?

Is a GPS a good alternative to incarceration?

2006-11-11 18:02:16 · 16 answers · asked by big-brother 3

2006-11-11 17:40:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

In relation to their relations with the world.

2006-11-11 17:31:48 · 21 answers · asked by kau la poo 2

2006-11-11 17:31:45 · 20 answers · asked by amin 1

What is it with these psychos? I can barely keep up with this ethnic cleansing madness. From Afghanistan, to Iraq, to Pakistan, to Gaza and Sri Lanka - state run militaries are killing more civilians in a few months than any band of terrorists could dream of killing in a dozen years.

And, without exception, they all offer the same pathetic excuse for their atrocities - 'national security'. Is this the typical, twisted excuse of fascist governments gone mad with power? Governments that commit these atrocities all have one thing in common - they indiscriminately kill the people they purport to protect. Saddam comes to mind, but there are far worse.

Wheres the outrage?

2006-11-11 17:28:05 · 8 answers · asked by big-brother 3