English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is it with these psychos? I can barely keep up with this ethnic cleansing madness. From Afghanistan, to Iraq, to Pakistan, to Gaza and Sri Lanka - state run militaries are killing more civilians in a few months than any band of terrorists could dream of killing in a dozen years.

And, without exception, they all offer the same pathetic excuse for their atrocities - 'national security'. Is this the typical, twisted excuse of fascist governments gone mad with power? Governments that commit these atrocities all have one thing in common - they indiscriminately kill the people they purport to protect. Saddam comes to mind, but there are far worse.

Wheres the outrage?

2006-11-11 17:28:05 · 8 answers · asked by big-brother 3 in Politics & Government Politics

"bev" I'am absolutely amazed. Im gonna keep this quote to use as an example.

"the deeds that have been done to keep America free are privileged information, it's called heroism"

2006-11-11 18:04:29 · update #1

8 answers

There is little outrage due to the big lie. Whatever the case,you can bet we are misinformed. We follow our leader's story, trusting them to tell us the truth, a big mistake, and then back him up at crunch time. Fascism thrives on ignorance, complacency, and trust, until it is too late to change course. Iraq is a good example. We were worked up because of 9/11, we wanted justice for the attack, so we went into Afghanistan. Somehow we also ended up in Iraq! The big boys who run things, sip on their Napoleon Brandy and cigars, while the rest of us are always trying to catch up. It is always too late if we do, after the violence has been done. Then we are left to offer lame arguments for why it was all such a good idea in the first place.

2006-11-11 17:31:22 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 3 0

If each and every guy believes that his movements are committed in the defence of his united states, united states and available possibility of existence, he will take the 'acceptable' line of defence- that's attack. that's time-honored thinking. As Marx tells us, at last even the opressed turns into the oppressor, ie, the jobs of potential corrupt or perhaps the acceptable intentioned adult males, whilst enjoined to what's or would be a source of potential, turns into not undemanding located to stand up to the corruption and the entice of potential surounding them..as a manner to keep such potential, manipulation and concern are needed. the time-honored components of suggestions, ie, the clicking and media we examine and consider (with the aid of fact we believe it) the human beings we talk over with ( with the aid of fact they oftentimes make stronger our imaginative and prescient of the worldwide) make stronger our perceptions and ergo our responses on a commonly used foundation. This merely desires blown out of scale by making use of yet another egotistical, concern riddled, undemocratic piss service provider who's merely too apprehensive of the possibility they could be incorrect As Orwell states, in case you prefer to create peace provide them conflict, not something like conflict to unite factions..and subsequently followers commit atrocities in the call of a reason, not merely with the aid of fact they persist with a blinded redundant oracle whose voice could echo into the wilderness the place empty vessels belong..

2016-10-17 04:25:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Plain and simple...humans are stupid. The powers that be are so insecure of their hold that they kill the very people they are supposed to protect. They know their policies are no good, so they instill fear in the population just to keep power. And shouting about it does no good. Their are too many of the rest of the world leaders who are pacifists (aka WHIMPS). They look the other way and hope it never makes it to their shores.

2006-11-11 17:34:09 · answer #3 · answered by unclewill67 4 · 2 0

Civilians ALWAYS get the ***** end of the stick in WAR.
While the civilians starve and freeze and run for their lives the soldiers and Generals eat better, live better, have better clothing, and can at least defend themselves.
They get the monuments and the praise.
The civilians get buried in mass graves.
Theres nothing do be done about it until humanity just about destroys itself and maybe in 100,000 years we will have evolved into a new species.

2006-11-11 18:04:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Do you want the people who died in 9/11 to die without a cause? Do you care about their families? They didn't choose to go to war, they had war thrust apon them. We can't just let terrrorists get away with what they did, or else they would do it again and again and again.

Thank God you are still alive, because the people in 9/11 aren't right now. It could happen again, and it very well might, but our only defense was to go to war, and stop them, to make them pay for what they did to our country, for the chaos they initiated.

2006-11-11 17:35:58 · answer #5 · answered by Kaity 3 · 0 4

the deeds that have been done to keep America free are privileged information, it's called heroism

2006-11-11 17:46:00 · answer #6 · answered by bev 5 · 0 4

Just be glad we got the "decider" on our side...right?

2006-11-11 17:32:14 · answer #7 · answered by dstr 6 · 3 1

How do you propose we wage war without killing civilians?

2006-11-11 17:31:06 · answer #8 · answered by Sabrina H 4 · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers