Military - July 2006

"fighting war to make peace is like having sex to gain back ur virginity!"

2006-07-02 15:36:13 · 20 answers · asked by Pisqualli 3

"Agent Orange" is a chemical used to spary the land in Vietnam to kill vegetation during the war. It caused "Cancer" in our G.I.`s.

2006-07-02 15:34:21 · 5 answers · asked by Patches 5

2006-07-02 15:33:48 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

husband: active duty Air Force
wife: non-military

2006-07-02 15:25:41 · 7 answers · asked by thejokker 5

I'm thinking of volunteering with them but would like some input and stuff please!

2006-07-02 14:59:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why the heck s Israel bombing innocent civilians all for a low life soldier when they already have like 30 Hamas soldiers and they are freekin raping little arabic girls... i swear to god, wullah, they are going to hell..... if anyone feels me, please answer back!!!

2006-07-02 14:49:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

ft. lewis 114 cav 1st briguade 2id stryker

2006-07-02 14:28:46 · 3 answers · asked by Jessica G 1

2006-07-02 14:22:23 · 10 answers · asked by phendy_22 1

Alright. The Geneva Convention Documents provide rights to militants. To be a militant you must fufill at least one Basic Requirements.
1. The militant must wear identifying insignia to relate them to a countries military.
2. They must carry arms openly.
3. A country must claim them as citizens.

Now, we've gone and extended Constitutional Rights to the prisoners we've taken. Which means they have to adhere to our laws. But we can't try them for murder or terrorism because of the Ex Post Facto Law. They commited the crime when they were not under our Laws. And if we try them for international terrorism, they are tried with our rights, which makes them citizens of our nation. Therfore we claim them, which fufills one of the requirements of the Geneva Convention. Is this correct? Are these terrorist unlawful combatant and deserve no rights? I think so.

2006-07-02 14:06:57 · 14 answers · asked by Randall M 2

I think we should get the press out of there and let our guys do there job . I think it would be a good start

2006-07-02 14:05:19 · 16 answers · asked by TATER 1

2006-07-02 13:59:08 · 7 answers · asked by Armybrat 1

2006-07-02 13:42:46 · 14 answers · asked by Armybrat 1

2006-07-02 13:23:05 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the future, with the exception of of an all out attack on our country, I think, The President, Vice President, All members of the Cabinet, all menbers of The House of Represenatives, all menbers of the Senate and all of those who hold political post, on the Federal, State and Local Governments . Reguardless of Gender, Physical Condition or Age, should lead the attack. The back up of course , should be thier family members over the age of 18 yrs. I wonder how they would feel about "saving some poor downtrodden country if this plan were to be embraced. O.K. I know it will never happen. A second solution would be to employ mercenaries. They seem to be very efficient. Also their cost is very attractive as compaired to what is being spent and the loss of lives of our troops.

2006-07-02 13:10:57 · 13 answers · asked by oscar 2

2006-07-02 13:08:15 · 7 answers · asked by puckhead505 1

The game America's Army, which was developed by the U.S. government, cost many millions of taxpayers' money to make. The government claims that it is a good recruiting tool for young Americans who might be intrigued by the cool combat that the game portrays war to be. Proponents also claim that the game provides combat training for soldiers. I've played the game, and I think it's fun, but I don't think it's an appropriate use of taxpayer money. You could even contend that this game is a sort of propaganda. In the game, the player is forced to go through army training (this training is relatively easy, especially when compared to the real thing); when that is complete, he/she can play online in the team-based game as U.S. soldiers battling terrorist enemies. The game is basically like Counterstrike. After dying, the players simply respawn and battle again to try to stop other players all over the world on the other team from completing their objective.

2006-07-02 12:41:31 · 9 answers · asked by Captain Hero 4

I believe some of the greatest include:

King David
Julius Caesar
Alexander the Great
Augustus Caesar
Trajan
Hannibal
Attila the Hun
Constantine I
Ghengis Khan
Napoleon
George Washington
Andrew Jackson
Robert E. Lee
Adolf Hitler
George Patton
Douglas Macarthur
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Horatio Nelson
Winston Churchill
Lt. Col. Hal Moore
Norman Schwarzkopf

2006-07-02 12:35:14 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Someone mentioned they have issues working under someone that is satanist. And wondered what they would do.

2006-07-02 12:25:40 · 14 answers · asked by slee z 3

P.s Bush is a Good President.

2006-07-02 12:24:44 · 15 answers · asked by Supercowboyman 2

Why when the United States goes to war, we always invade other countries. Yet other countries never come to our land to fight? I'm not saying I want this to happen, but I'm just curious. Another army can easily just come over here and take over like we do.

2006-07-02 12:24:04 · 21 answers · asked by Simmy 5

The way the Iraqi resistance is kicking the pitiful American Military each and everyday the USA better hope the resistance will just fade away. The American Military is puke poor to the Max. The USA military can't even beat up a rag tag group of men with basic weapons. If I were a Marine or a soldier I would be ready to call it quits because this Iraq war cannot and will not be won buy the USA.

2006-07-02 12:06:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

So the Roswell basics:
- US military airbase, terribly secret, keep away, etc.
- unusual aircraft crashes
- child-sized coffins required
- no other explanation forthcoming
- various stories lead to UFO theories emerging amongst joe public
- bullshit alien autopsy video (ignore)

My explanation: the military were experimenting with small spyplanes, so small they had to be piloted and operated by children. We're in 1947, way before robotics of course. Some kids died during the programme of tests. Big disgrace that they should sacrifice kids that way. The UFO idea blows up by chance, and military find it quite convenient - they don't fancy telling the truth.

Well?

You can blow this away if you want, I'm sure half of you will...

2006-07-02 11:57:38 · 13 answers · asked by wild_eep 6

I think they are HOT !

2006-07-02 11:38:01 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I would like to know your point of wiev.....the kamikaze were great warriors, proud, do you think the arabas that are killing the innocents are to be considered the same? do they seserve to be named kamikaze?

2006-07-02 11:06:09 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I HAVE NATURAL HAIR SO ITS WAVY CANT WEAR BRAIDS OR ANYTHING FOR BOOTCAMP DONT WANT TO GO MEGA BALDD OR NAYHTING ANY FEMALES KNOW ANY IDEAS OR WENT TO BOOTCAMP AND SEEN IDEAS NAVY PEOPLE ONLY ?OTHER BRANCHES HAVE DIFFERENT STANDARDS AND THAT INFORMATION WOULD NOT BE HELPFUL

2006-07-02 10:51:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-02 10:07:12 · 16 answers · asked by heatherpta79 2

if u dont support that or reject such action,
why none can stop isreali from committing such acts
and if u do support that whythe whole world rejected sept 11 event
my question doesnt mean i support 9\11 events
but it just compaison
why killing palestines is ok, they are humans too and civilians
while the whole world stand up for one soldier kidnaped not even a civilian

2006-07-02 09:49:52 · 15 answers · asked by maryam 2

I am doing research on my Grandfather, I can't find any information about the 193rd QM Gas Supply Company 1942-1945 on the internet. Any Ideas, Helpful research hints?

2006-07-02 09:44:24 · 7 answers · asked by nuts4pets2 2

My husband is in BCT and he says I have 90 days from the date he enlisted to get this done. I only have a couple weeks left! Thanks!!

2006-07-02 09:41:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-02 09:35:18 · 2 answers · asked by JGreen 2