There's something I don't understand about this show. The perpetrator sends pictures of his privates to an undercover police officer he thinks is a minor. Then he arrives at the house, intending to have sex with a minor.
But at no point is there any real minor. So how has any crime been committed?
Is it merely his intention, even if no minor exists?
If this is the case, then imagine this scenario:
A man with poor vision sees an old lady walking down the street. He comes up to her, thinking she is a child, and sexually propositions her.
Is he then guilty of sexual assault on a minor, even if there was no minor because, for whatever reason, the perpetrator was misinformed?
I find this mysterious!
I can understand when there's an actual minor in the mix somewhere. But when it's just a bunch of misled adults, how can they be guilty of child abuse? There was no child!
2007-05-18
07:49:10
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Zowzooma, the Angry Deity
2