Government - December 2006

FEMA is the Secret Government
Quote

FEMA was created by Nixon, strengthened by Carter, and employed by Reagan and Bush.
FEMA is above the President, but only an executive order proclaiming martial law can give FEMA total control.
Under Reagan, the REX 84 plan made it illegal to protest the U.S. invasion of a foreign country. All dissidents/protesters are in the FEMA/Homeland Security data base.
FEMA spent most of its black budget constructing underground facilities and prison camps. It came under scrutiny after it failed to spend more than 6% of its budget on the aftermath of Hurricane Andrew in 1992.
FEMA again failed the victims of Hurricane Katrina, because it was never designed to help people, only to round up and annihilate them. Its main purpose is to use its funds to protect the elite in times of crisis.
Economic disaster, nuclear war, internal protests or riots--all can trigger a takeover by FEMA.

2006-12-26 07:53:01 · 11 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

A simple authorization to use "all possible means" doesn't count.

2006-12-26 07:26:55 · 10 answers · asked by apalfi2 1

2006-12-26 04:54:30 · 2 answers · asked by ? 3

2006-12-26 04:21:48 · 28 answers · asked by rhondaisin 1

2006-12-26 02:12:43 · 1 answers · asked by martin h 6

I mean,won't it greatly reduce crime and terrorism because of the amount of agencies running our lives?What's so bad about it?

2006-12-26 01:41:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-26 00:34:00 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-25 23:39:53 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-25 23:22:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-25 22:19:03 · 6 answers · asked by ryanmaxene 1

2006-12-25 22:07:49 · 13 answers · asked by ctbedel 1

2006-12-25 22:04:51 · 20 answers · asked by Ron T 1

Given the USA is still "to date" a "colony" of Britain, subject to the laws of the UK, Removing "Habeas corpus" undermines the foundation of British law ( Magna Charta, clause 39) Neo cronies awarded the title of "Sir" under a Republic confirm this as fact. Therefore making it illegal, unlawful, a felony if not a "treasonable" offense. The USA still remains a colony in antebellum and answerable to the UK Crown. Views please?

2006-12-25 21:51:46 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I read that his brother had actually arranged for his marriage when he was young, but Mr.Kalam forgot, as he was very busy in the Lab...

And when he remembered and came to his village, it was too late and the marriage was called off !

And he returned back to his Lab...

2006-12-25 21:51:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

already she is the shadow PM

2006-12-25 21:24:49 · 14 answers · asked by shivkumar r 2

2006-12-25 21:00:57 · 22 answers · asked by j j 1

If liberals want to take God out of everything having to do with the government....why then does the government use churches as voting stations?

Seems like that would be in violation of the separation of church and state law that they are always crying about. Should they be crying to the government about having to go to a church to vote?

Where would these polling stations be if they didn't have them in churches?

2006-12-25 20:40:50 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm a christian and I celebrate these holidays, but politicians and government in general have taken God out of every area that they have the power to . So why not save tax payers money and go to work on these days. I would like to get my mail on Sundays, Christmas and Easter. The same judges that voted against prayer in schools could oversee their courts on these days as well. The list goes on, but I'm sure I've made my point.

2006-12-25 20:30:24 · 8 answers · asked by cargirldawn 3

2006-12-25 19:54:05 · 5 answers · asked by drwhothelast 1

in malaysia

2006-12-25 18:32:53 · 4 answers · asked by kamalakanthiyogesvaran 1

Keep in mind that our current president has not done a very good job for this nation. I feel that a democrate is needed in office again. I remember when we had Bill clinton I did not worry about the state of the nation, I knew we where going strong and doing well. Having Bush in office has made me uneasy especially when he has put this nation a war we don't need to be in and lied about his intentions for doing so or atleast has not giving good enough reasons for it. He still has yet to prove we need to be where we are. I think Clinton is a good choice because she was a Strong active first lady and has seen how things are ran and would be a very decive person in office and would help correct the current state of affairs in this country that has gone down hill since her husband left office. I only wish she would have Divorced BIll I think that will hurt her to not have divorced him. How do you feel?

2006-12-25 18:06:56 · 19 answers · asked by qcdon30 2

2006-12-25 18:00:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-25 17:34:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

HUD and the projects
housing and urban develepment and the projects ???whats the differnce or are the really the same?
i kno it dosent really fit in this catogory but there isnt really 1 for this and their both goverment housing.....

2006-12-25 17:04:45 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Given the bewildering array of advertising, marketing, spin doctoring and subliminal messages we are bombarded with 24 hours a day, most of which we are consciously unaware of, how can we be sure any decisions (especially buying and voting ones) we make are actually rational?

2006-12-25 14:29:38 · 19 answers · asked by Jim B 1

Does anybody else hate when you go to answer a question and this addition to the original question has so many case in points that they seemed to have answered the question themselves or are so misguided with there "clarification" that you would rather stone them? I am just curious because I am not a violent person but it just seems that you get ready to answer a question and they already have. I mean I don't mean to be rude and I know people are just starting with this question and answer thing but it seems they are in a rush to post a question, and loose x points, instead of trying to answer those questions that have so many additions to the fact. I hope nobody gets offended by this because most questions require alot of explanation but you would think they would prepare us by putting a ... or something after the question so one could know to prepare themselves for alot more beuracy. Also, there is a spelling check option available so why don't they use that or a god dictionary

2006-12-25 13:57:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-25 13:40:12 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Every since people have started going against what the gov't does we have been afraid to win a war by all out force. We dropped an atom bomb on two non military targets in Japan to show our power and make them surrender. We stompped the Brits by fighting like the Indians and not standing eye to eye to fight. Now we are afraid to get the job done for fear of what the world and even our own people will think. MAN UP AMERICA AND TO HELL WITH EVERYONE ELSE. We are the biggest the baddest and the toughest country on the planet. If we weren't than why would all the other countries come here to hold thier UN meetings? I don't see them doing it in Britian or France. No it's here!!!

2006-12-25 12:57:40 · 21 answers · asked by masterhowie069 1

2006-12-25 11:25:38 · 30 answers · asked by J~Dogg 1

Like Roswell, if alians did come I don't care, maybe it's better that I don't know. There are many other examples. Maybe it's better that the public doesn't know everything for our own safety. I'm just throwing my thoughts out there. What do you think?

2006-12-25 11:06:08 · 18 answers · asked by NoDoubt 1