Can there be any logical denial whatsoever that the U.S. government engineered 9/11 as an excuse to go to war?

Answer 1

I say glock is wrong about this, the intergalactic race of burrowing nematodes ALL HAIL THEIR HOLY NAME! will come riding their glorious prarie dog army and defeat farclars ravening minions, the giant ferrets, at the coming Clevelend reckoning!

Answer 2

Yeah, there is. First, there's this funny thing called common sense.
1. HOW would they have kept it a secret? The sheer amount of people that would have to have been involved, and the years of planning, makes it nearly impossible.
2. The only conspiracy theory which makes sense, which is that perhaps the government hired the terrorists (I'll get to why this is the only one that would make sense), is blown out of the water by the fact that there would be no purpose for it. What, for money? Please. There are easier ways to get money without enraging an entire country, not to mention the Arab world because they think we're after them, and CERTAINLY not to mention involving us in two wars, and killing three thousand innocent civilians, 59,000 Iraqi civilians, and almost 3000 of our own soldiers.
3. There are still conspiracy theories out there. If our government was diabolical enough to attempt such a thing as organizing the terrorist attacks on 9/11, they wouldn't hesitate to execute every person who even THOUGHT that they were behind 9/11. Is the CIA at your house? No? Alright then.
4. I mentioned that the only way it would make sense is if the terrorists were hired by the government. The reason for this is that there were too many witnesses, and it is obvious that there really were terrorists on the planes...unless of course, those who called their loved ones and described what was happening were lying. If that's the case, why would they lie? Were they paid off? And if they were paid off, how did the government find them? How did they know that what they were planning wouldn't get out? And furthermore, WHERE did the people on the planes go? Are they still alive somewhere? There are too many people who SAW the planes, and only an idiot wouldn't know the difference between a civilian plane and a military drone, or a missile.

I could go on, but those are my top four. It just doesn't make any sense. Nothing that goes on in DC can be kept a secret for long. Eventually, it leaks. That's just the way it is.
Personally, I think the conspiracy theories bring up more questions than they answer. They debunk themselves. They don't need anyone to do it for them.



http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/...
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://underground.soulawakenings.com/ti...
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.ht...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_...
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1348..........
http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/05/l...
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo...
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/displa...
http://www.nobeliefs.com/comments8.htm.....
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/000...

Answer 3

Hello,

Logical Denial.

That would require at least 2/3rds of Americans thinking outside the box and realizing that our very own government did engineer 9/11 to start a war and to have us live in submission to our government.

Hope this helps you................ : - O

Answer 4

911 was a 'catalyst' perhaps, but it was not the only ingredient in the making of 2003 Iraq War. Since 91 Iraq War there have been persistent effort by people from the US gov and Iraq to make case for Saddam's removal. This was probably not highly publicized as 911. Numerous Iraqis intellectuals, exiles, dissidents (see Ahmed Chalabi) even lobbied the US congress asking to remove Saddam. Many in the US agreed well before 911 Saddam should be removed, but didn't have political edge or public support. Bush administration pulled off some crazy bureacratic acrobatic maneuvers to make WMD case aided by 911 fear to gain public support behind it. It's wishful thinking to say US gov engineered mascre impacting its economy in negative way for the sake of geo-politics. Theres some big issue with government involvement in 911.

US have taken military action without UN clearance before. If we can go to war at will why pull off massive stunt to make case for war?

If gov bureacrats can lie about WMD, other things do they even need physical actions to make case for war? Or just create intelligence that Saddam is about to strike US?

The US have been trying to provoke Saddam for years by airstrikes on Iraq. Why not create fake Iraqi attack on US airforce/military in Middle East which is far more believable than Saddam aiding group of obsecure terrorist who flew planes into buildings?

If they can create such a believable 911 attack why is their WMD case so weak? As it has been revealed by insiders and reporters and 'leaks'.


Besides countless physical evidences there are lot of historical facts and other little known information that make 911 conspiracy look incredibly stupid. People might say 'well that's what gov want you to think or believe.' That is just ad/hoc, pseudo scientifc jargon for 'yea but, they still did it.'

Answer 5

First of all associating logic and 911 conspiracy is a oxymoron.
Second you have way too much faith in government competency
to believe that the thousands of people that would have to be involve with such a heinous act and no one leaked is quite a stretch.

Answer 6

While I wouldn't put anything past our government, and Bush in particular, there are too many people on Capitol Hill in an "oversight" capacity to believe that that could have happened. Having said that, I think it is perfectly plausible that Saddam was NOT the threat that we were led to believe. After all, wars make presidents...except in this case, it will, in history's eyes, destroy Bush.

Answer 7

Okay - the most logical denial is that - in such a large organization as the US government - with an operation on such a large scale as the 9/11 attacks - it is extremely unlikely that no one has leaked anything solid yet.

We are talking government here, mind you.

Answer 8

i repeat the Iraqi war had nothing to do with 9/11 people. instead of skipping to conclusions its better to gain a FULL understanding of the situation. I think Bush should never had declared war on Iraq so soon when people were still upset over the bombings. that is a main reason I feel that people werent very supportive of him when he wanted to go to war.

Answer 9

Yes. In fact there is no logical reason to believe that anyony other than Islamofascists were responsible gor 9/11. Repeating lies changes nothing. They are still lies.

Answer 10

The only people that could possibly deny that logically are intelligent, rational, people capable of researching an incident and coming up with conclusions that are reached independently and scientifically