Government - December 2006

If you look at the crash sight of the Pentagon, it is incosistent than that of the official story. The official story states that the plane was hijacked at around 9:00 AM and crashed in some hour and a half later leaving a 16 foot diameter hole in the recently upgraded wall of the Pentagon.
Lets take a look at a Boeing 757: The wingspan of this plane is 124' 10" and the tail height is 44.5'. Look it up its true.
Supposedly this plane left only a 16 foot hole. According to the official story the reason it is this way is because the wings snapped off upon impact. There is no remains of any wings or plane debris for that matter. The only debris was lightweight material that was being carried off by workers. How are pieces of plane being carried like that.
The official story also claims that this now very lightweight plane was able to go through 16 feet of solid concrete.

2006-12-01 08:57:07 · 6 answers · asked by Absolution 4

2006-12-01 08:46:06 · 5 answers · asked by cuddlespinksixflags 1

The religious leaders in Iraq are political, have an army, fight for thier belief. I do not get it if we twisted the current governments arm to write the constitution the way we wanted and MR. President Bush aproved the whole thing with quite a celibration if I remember how did the religion get in?

2006-12-01 08:41:50 · 3 answers · asked by Pablo 6

2006-12-01 08:34:45 · 10 answers · asked by STORMY K 3

2006-12-01 08:30:15 · 2 answers · asked by STORMY K 3

2006-12-01 08:28:55 · 8 answers · asked by STORMY K 3

that are related to the Iraqi invasion and the war against terrorism? I'm writing an essay on the whole thing and the only thing I'm finding on the net is jokes about him, I need serious and real quotes. Can someone help me out?

2006-12-01 08:21:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

But do nothing about Min. Wage?

I personally do not want the increase but I thought there was positive change coming to the USA, not its congressmen or senaters...

Can you enlighten me about this big change in WASHINGTON?

2006-12-01 08:14:53 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-01 06:53:33 · 11 answers · asked by kodiak 2

It's not perfect yet, but this is my first draft. It goes to the tune of the traditional anthem. Open to suggestions for a few parts.

Oh say why can't we see? Through the smogs dirty spite.
For the president we hail, like the nazis did Hitler.
Whose broad stripes and bright stars (Any suggestions?)
for the murder we watched, and Iraqi children on CNN screaming
And the white phospherus bright glare, as the scent of flesh fills the air
Gave proof to those rag heads, that the terrorists are the ones who actually care
Oh say does that star spangled banner (any suggestions)
o'er the land of the commies, and the home of the frayed.

Still working on the other verses.

2006-12-01 06:50:04 · 18 answers · asked by NONAME 1

There is a lot of furror over Keith Ellison's decision to use the Koran when he takes his oath of office. However, we have Jewish members of Congress... what do they use to swear their oath? When people testify in court do they always use a Bible? I'm sure Muslims have objected to that practice? Why is it more newsworthy that he's using it to take his oath in Congress? Wouldn't it be hypocritical of him to swear on a Bible? The book does not have the same meaning for him. Swearing on the Koran seems to imply that he takes the oath seriously, doesn't it?

2006-12-01 06:38:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-01 06:19:15 · 7 answers · asked by adrienne h 1

2006-12-01 05:42:46 · 1 answers · asked by diego f 1

This is the first war that the taxes were cut , can you believe that .
Every other war the American people were asked to sacrifice something .
In order to win this war , we as a nation have to want to .
How can all the American people be behind this war when we aren't asked to do giveup anything to win it ?
If this is a war for our freedom and safety , then shouldn't we all have to share in the pain of war ?

2006-12-01 05:34:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it the leftist or the other guy?

2006-12-01 05:14:02 · 6 answers · asked by superstes88 3

Iraq's borders were drawn arbitrarily on a map causeing a mix of ethnic cultures whose leaders have no wish to coexist happily.

With out interference there a large number of highly likely negetive outcomes.

One example:
the kurds in the north are likely to insist on an independant state. such a state is likely to result in the Kurds in Turkey wishing to join. Turkey will not like this and retaliate by either increasing its persecutution of its native kurds or invade the kurdish area of iraq.

If you aren't aware of the above or other possible issues go and look it up. One area to start is the fact that there are two main, different and opposing sects of Muslims. And three main (though now small) sects of Christianity

With so many factors suggesting that stepping straight into democracy won't work (examples can be seen elsewere in the world) Why does the coallition feel it will?

2006-12-01 04:41:10 · 5 answers · asked by MarcusHawksley 2

Tolls on motorways, council tax going up, charges on rubbish collection, where will it all end?

2006-12-01 03:18:24 · 21 answers · asked by Anii 1

Outside the U.S. it is perceived as a disastrous goverment.

2006-12-01 02:21:01 · 14 answers · asked by Atreides1998 3

2006-12-01 01:40:43 · 34 answers · asked by yoyoknickers2 2

Why did she close the pits, was it really to defeat the unions or because they were unprofitable and in debt.
Why did she sell the services - Gas, Electricity, B.T. etccc..., my point is this. Today, you have several telephone companies and several energy suppliers. Did she sell them off early because she knew that they would be worthless when the competition arrived, I don't understand it. She made the rich richer and the poor poorer. Is that the general story behind it. Who's policy did she copy and what other countries have / had not public services. Which countries today have public utilities companies. The last question is what would you do if you were in a position of influence to change her wrong doing or right doing - what would you do to build on her success or right her wrong. This is an impartial question and for all intents and purposes I am neither with her or against her. Sensible answers please.

2006-12-01 01:25:20 · 12 answers · asked by Nelson 2