Government - December 2006

or is it another one?

2006-12-03 09:06:01 · 11 answers · asked by kristin_elizabeth_864a 2

Have you noticed in Italy, last the 2 december, the great demonstration in Rome against the actual Government?
You're abroad and so you're more umpartial...so...what ho you think about it? And about our Government?

2006-12-03 08:59:24 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

reduce crime - teach the youth self resepct, and sort out many of Britiains social problems

2006-12-03 08:58:37 · 28 answers · asked by betty 1

It seems that purley for propaganda they used Communism as a nice face to mask thier writhing serpants of Totalitarianism. It seems ludicris to me that everyone has been calling thier goverment Communism when it was clearly not. I mean, wealth didn't even come close to being distrubuted evenly. Hardly anything was paid for since it all went into the military budget. These are not signs of a Communist goverment, at leas not the text book of Communism.

So my real question is why call a pretty rainbow a terdstorm? Has America been drinking too much of it's own hubris?

2006-12-03 08:49:44 · 9 answers · asked by NoFear OnlyUnderstanding 1

" From now on, the people who control money will run the world with only one objective--to make money. If it becomes necessary to overthrow governments in order to do so, then governments will be overthrown. This is the new ideology, so powerful that it is the only one permitted. No opposition will be tolerated. The free market now translates into unrestrained dominance of the rich over the poor, the strong over the weak." ( Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, quoted by Reuters, attacking "new capitalists.")

2006-12-03 08:40:28 · 4 answers · asked by *~SoL~ * Pashaa del Ñuñcaa. 4

titles of nobility/fiefdoms/funding for education/ or land for national parks. im stuck

2006-12-03 08:36:44 · 3 answers · asked by kristin_elizabeth_864a 2

HOLD YOUR HEAD IN SHAME

2006-12-03 08:12:46 · 31 answers · asked by betty 1

2006-12-03 07:23:11 · 13 answers · asked by STORMY K 3

croquet, and in his cowboy outfit, scare the Taliban with his six shooter?

2006-12-03 07:06:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a theory that has been around for a long time.

http://ulsteramerica.blogspot.com/2006/02/welcome.html

The Scots-Irish and English were the first people to settle in the US, and, wouldn't it be interesting to add a state? The IRA wouldn't be able to rebel against our military, and they wouldn't be much of a threat, their country would be a better economical place if they belonged to the US. It could mean better trade and quite possibly lower taxes for us.

2006-12-03 06:55:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-03 06:53:51 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

To return them to Argentine?

dreyko47@yahoo.com

2006-12-03 06:51:21 · 15 answers · asked by Vishy Anand 3

*** War and Globalization - The Truth Behind 9/11 ***

- War and Globalization - The Truth Behind September 11, Michel Chossudovsky -

..."In this lecture by Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream Media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by “Islamic terrorists”. Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration"...

..."According to Chossudovsky, the “War on Terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “War on Terrorism” is a War of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World Order“, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex"...

..." September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a War without borders. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State"...

(Full Article)
[link to www.rinf.com]

2006-12-03 06:45:13 · 1 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

*** War and Globalization - The Truth Behind 9/11 ***

- War and Globalization - The Truth Behind September 11, Michel Chossudovsky -

..."In this lecture by Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream Media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by “Islamic terrorists”. Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration"...

..."According to Chossudovsky, the “War on Terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “War on Terrorism” is a War of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World Order“, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex"...

..." September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a War without borders. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State"...

(Full Article)
[link to www.rinf.com]

2006-12-03 06:39:56 · 3 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

*** Bush Defector To Demolish 911 Lies On May 6 ***

(04-18-06)

..."The former top economist in Bush's Department of Labor, Morgan Reynolds, will speak out on the 9/11 inside job at the State Historical Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison on Saturday, May 6th. The film Loose Change will be shown, and refreshments served, starting at 1 p.m, and Reynolds will speak at 3:00 p.m."...

..."Dr. Reynolds, who holds three U.W.-Madison degrees, and who is currently Professor of Economics at Texas A&M University, will present evidence that top Bush Administration officials orchestrated the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and the murder of almost 2,500 Americans, as a pretext for initiating their pre-planned "long war" in the Middle East.

The videos, and further information about Dr. Reynolds' May 6th speech, are available from the event's sponsor, the Madison-based Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth: [link to mujca.com]

2006-12-03 06:36:55 · 1 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

*** Bush Defector To Demolish 911 Lies On May 6 ***

(04-18-06)

..."The former top economist in Bush's Department of Labor, Morgan Reynolds, will speak out on the 9/11 inside job at the State Historical Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison on Saturday, May 6th. The film Loose Change will be shown, and refreshments served, starting at 1 p.m, and Reynolds will speak at 3:00 p.m."...

..."Dr. Reynolds, who holds three U.W.-Madison degrees, and who is currently Professor of Economics at Texas A&M University, will present evidence that top Bush Administration officials orchestrated the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and the murder of almost 2,500 Americans, as a pretext for initiating their pre-planned "long war" in the Middle East.

"While more Americans doubt the 9/11 story every week, evidence abounds that many have a mental block against rational examination of the evidence about 9/11" writes Dr. Reynolds in a recent article. This mental block, he thinks, amounts to willful ignorance-not just about 9/11, but about history."...

...""Governments throughout history have provoked or staged attacks on their own people to serve the powers behind the throne ('the money power'), glorify themselves, engage in vast government spending, reward friends, exert domestic control, stimulate the juices of war, annex neighbors and pursue vast geostrategic rearrangements (the 'global domination project)"...

2006-12-03 06:35:42 · 2 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

or don't the cacti deserve to be treated that way?

2006-12-03 06:24:37 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-03 06:15:37 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

country except Britain?

2006-12-03 05:44:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does this scare anyone else?

It makes the U.S. economy hostage to the whims of foreign investors, including governments. Eventually, they could decide they have better places to invest than in U.S. debt securities. This might be a gradual decision. Or it might not be. If the latter, it would cause a surge in interest rates (because the Treasury would have to offer more enticing terms to attract buyers) and trigger a recession.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20061201/cm_usatoday/lookwhoownsusdebtnow

2006-12-03 04:21:09 · 10 answers · asked by john_stolworthy 6

1. As a result of being bound by the U.S. Constitution our government is a _ i _ _ _ _ _ form of government.
(I was thinking maybe liberal, liberty???)

2006-12-03 04:09:40 · 1 answers · asked by avalentin911 2

i recently invested some money into a stock, my husband assured me it would be safe, i was a student with limited savings and out of work, he has been doing stocks for years, i asked him if it would be safe, he said yes so i invested in it, over aperiod of 9 months the stock went down, i was losing my money rapidly, in the end my husband advised me to sell it at a big loss and reinvest in another stock and give the 2nd stock 7 weeks to improve, that way it would give me bacl ALL my money, he said it would be a much quicker way than waiting for the 1st one to improve, he guaranteed my money back if there was no improvement, after 7 weeks there was none, i offered to extend twice making it 14 weeks longer for it to improve, it got steadily worse and worse, in the end my husband refunded me the second stock losses but has said the first stock is MY responsibilty and i must accept the losses so i have offered to pay him back as he refunded me in full then he said it is my responsibility

2006-12-03 04:01:45 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-03 03:24:46 · 5 answers · asked by JDM Cargurl <3 1

have no problem over-funding our military to the point where our military can squash any militia like a bug?

I understand arming yourselves to hunt and protect property but the ultimate purpose of the 2nd to protect from a tyrannical governement so how do you rationalize the above?


Serious answers, please.

2006-12-03 03:23:52 · 11 answers · asked by In 2 Deep 3

are there any recent successes or failures??

2006-12-03 03:19:40 · 3 answers · asked by JDM Cargurl <3 1

2006-12-03 01:17:07 · 10 answers · asked by . 6

2006-12-03 01:08:45 · 8 answers · asked by . 6

2006-12-03 00:56:29 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-03 00:29:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-03 00:08:44 · 6 answers · asked by vykuntarao 2 1