2006-12-25 17:34:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Second to Tony Blair.
2006-12-25 18:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ouch. That is rather brutal, especially when you are basing all opinion on a book.
A leader by himself is not much. It is the way he inspires everybody under him, or those who serve with him, and the people he leads to act and behave. That cumulative action will be the judge of the man. -QNH
2006-12-26 01:46:33 · answer #2 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You could be right, but historians need more evidence. Are you speaking of his Economic Policy (pretty poor) his Foreign Policy (not much better) his Domestic Policy (who can forget the cones hotline ?) or what ? I'm not disagreeing with you, but you need to give examples and demonstrate how he was worse than other bad ones.
2006-12-26 01:56:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What about Anthony Eden or Neville Chamberlain
2006-12-26 01:53:40 · answer #4 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you've forgotten about Blair.
Major was a bit of a goof-ball but at least he didn't screw up the country like Blair with his socialist dogma and Marxist cronies.
2006-12-26 02:35:08 · answer #5 · answered by Ministry of Camp Revivalism 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion
2006-12-26 01:38:40 · answer #6 · answered by Shahzadi 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i still find unbelievable that he actually had an affair with that woman!!!!!!!!!!!! and i can think of worse PM,s we have had...his predecessor
2006-12-26 02:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
fortunately, he really isn't that bad, you just got all the bad press.
2006-12-26 01:37:08 · answer #8 · answered by judy r 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋