2006-12-25 11:25:38 · 30 answers · asked by J~Dogg 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
President's do not fight wars...dumb rednecks who ask stupid questions do...
2006-12-25 11:28:53 · answer #1 · answered by Mikey ~ The Defender of Myrth 7 · 8⤊ 6⤋
DUHH!!!!!
What moron liberal or retard progressive school did you attend?
ONLY ONE, American President has EVER led troops into battle. That was President George Washington.
Leaders are EXPECTED to stay safe, so that the countries leadership will remain intact, during the war.
I do not agree with us going into iraq, when their are more pressing targets, and I think that the prosecution of the war is, too politically correct. President Bush, is trying to hard to suck up to moron progressives and retarded liberals like you, who will not like him, no matter what he does. He should be fighting to win a war, instead fighting a politically correct war.
I DO NOT LIKE PRESIDENT BUSH EITHER.
However, unlike you stupid liberal progressives, I try to analyze and criticize each action and decision independently. Rather than simply generalize and ask stupid questions in Yahoo Answers.
2006-12-25 20:56:59 · answer #2 · answered by unico_nocturno 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Thank God, in this day and age, the rule is that the commander in chief, directs the war from a distance - I mean a safe distance :)
If the old rules remained, this would not have been pretty seeing George turned into a Frenchman! But then again, the war probably would not have started.
2006-12-25 23:12:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because he is just another draft dodging chicken**** prove me wrong George pick-up a rifle and show us what a man you really are bet you have a hard time figuring out which end the bang comes out of ! If you want the oil that bad Bush you go fight for it !
2006-12-25 21:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is no one answer to your question. In fact there is none. The fact that you write --and obviously think such a question is because you have President Bush and other Presidents that preceded him give you and protect that special right called "freedom of speech". Long Live America. I rest my case and you should take a rest and go to bed.
2006-12-25 19:36:53 · answer #5 · answered by s t 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well, first off, he's our president and thus, has a duty to lead the country. Secondly, he's not enlisted in the military, though he was in the military. If you're a liberal and are against our soldiers being over there, then why would you want him to go over there and put his life at risk? Doesn't make sense.
2006-12-25 19:29:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Have you served yet? If not, then how about you, then?
I've done my term of service, already, so no asking me to. Injured in the line of duty with a fractured L1 vertebrae.
2006-12-25 20:07:21 · answer #7 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because president don't fight in wars they run the country, but maybe he should but then again he might not know what he doing it not hes faught. I don't judge the man.
2006-12-25 22:19:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If he did go over to fight.....Who would Leno, Letterman, C OBrien, J Stewart make fun of every night?
2006-12-25 19:34:13 · answer #9 · answered by James O only logical answer D 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's war. Old men talk, young men fight.
2006-12-25 19:31:53 · answer #10 · answered by Sun Spot 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think being the commander and chief of the armed forces - correct me if I am worng but isn't he already in the military of sorts ?
2006-12-25 20:14:57 · answer #11 · answered by caciansf 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋