If there's going to be a 1-world government,won't it be a good thing?

Question

I mean,won't it greatly reduce crime and terrorism because of the amount of agencies running our lives?What's so bad about it?

Answer 1

Are you nuts?You want to have the same leader of countries that hate us and want to kill us also dictating the united states?I hope you dont vote.

Answer 2

The Bible teaches us that in the last days there will be a one world religious system which will be used by the devil in a great deception to ultimately war against God. Universalism could easily be used by the devil to help him accomplish this very thing. You see, there are a great many differences between religious systems. They cannot all be right. Because of these differences, hostilities often arise. But, if universalism were accepted by all religious systems, then it would logically greatly reduce hostilities both physical, intellectual, and spiritual. Sound good? It sure does. Except for one thing. It compromises the truth of the saving gospel of Jesus Christ who said He alone was the way the truth and the life. This means that all other systems are wrong! It means that Buddhism is not true. It means that Islam is not true. It means that only Christianity is true. There is no fellowship with darkness. Christians need to stand on God's word of truth which includes the narrow path to God of which not all will find it (Matt. 7:13-14), not man's word of "God will save everyone."
Universalist philosophy, if accepted by the worlds' religions, would greatly reduce the focus of differences between them. It would greatly reduce the need for orthodoxy, for defining and preaching the true God. But, the Bible teaches that Jesus alone is the savior and that now is the acceptable time of salvation... not the after-life. It teaches that there is one God, not many; that Jesus is God in flesh, not an angel or a "good man." Truth is at stake.
How many people will be deceived by universalism's comfortable message that all will be saved? Who knows. Universalism in itself is not a deception, just an error. But, how many will take refuge in its comforting doctrine and not come to a saving truth of Jesus? I can not say, but even one is too many.
I cannot help but notice that the secular world teaches tolerance, be-nice philosophy, and the belief that all will make it to heaven. Second chance redemption and a theology that teaches you'll make it no matter what is comfortable to the world's ears. Too bad the universalists agree with the world in this.

Answer 3

Government is Control of people wether it be by economic, religion, or force of arms and it does not take a contented people to exist.
Is the policing within a nation first duty to protect its citizens or the civil infrastructure necessary to govern the poplace?
A one world governemtn is coming and the only care it has about individuals is in the" who will rule" group not the masses. As Daniel webster put it, no matter the office, no matter the nobel words of a politic to serve , their main purpose is to rule.
I would suggest that one take a look at the corporate reasoning of politcal and economic entitys in US and Eurpope as the defining state of the New World Order.
It was put inot very fine detail by the Hudson Institute,
A buisness does not need a well edcuated populace to be a success but what it does need is a trainable mass, led by a small group of innovative individuals with an even smaller group of well educated and connected group to Administer over them.
Contrary to the thinking that American soft culture will change the world that culture is pop culture and Hedonistic in its outlook, pleasure as the mean of success.
The devices to feed that hedonism are not Freedom and Liberty but comfort and a populace so made cares not what form of government it has but only what it can gain or gets within that system.
The devices and structures of Liberty and Freedom can live on in memory long after they are gone.
The new entity looks upon humans as a resource to further economic controls for a small group and that resource is replenishable.
It is the human mind that will determine what is acceptable to control qand when a group controlls the only means of existence how soon will it turn to perversions of that control ?
You Decide!

Answer 4

Science fiction movies often present a one-world central government. In theory, it sounds great, but in practice, men are power mad and will start becoming dictators. Not just men, but agencies. Soon all your freedoms will be lost.

Also, as you can see from the problems in Iraq and Ireland and Africa and the -stan countries, people don't want to unite very much. They insist on their ancestral differences. Everyone wants to be top dog. How would you ever get the whole world to stand together.

The United Nations was supposed to start this work, but they have turned into a toothless tool. The idea is good, but the execution of the idea always flounders.

Answer 5

And what county is going to be the one world government? Do you really think a other county will give up their land for other government to take over. No county is not going to hand over there land without a fight. Do you relieze how many world wars there would have to be before something like that to happen. I think something like that can happen only if the Revelation from the bible came true. Then I can see a 1-world government happening until then no.

Answer 6

In theory it sounds like a good idea and in my student days I was very keen on this concept but it is fraught with too many issues. It would simply too complicated to manage, especially when many countries or regions [such as the Basque region in Northern Spain] are very nationalistic. At best we can hope for a United Nations with some real teeth and not dominated by the key players such as the USA.

Answer 7

What a good question for debate. I think eventually there will be one government but this depends upon the way the Earth turns out. For instance, if we do manage to halt global warming then countries might begin to work together more closely. We have already seen that Europe can run as one huge 'corporation' as it were.

However if resources continue to deplete, global warming takes a stronger hold then I feel it will become 'every country for itself.' America will continue to raid other countries for oil and when water starts to become a precious commodity in the western world, im sure the richer countries will exert their power even more so.

Answer 8

I think it is bad because then all countries would lose their sovereignty.

And, terrorists would not be stopped by a world government.

Would you want our American Troops to be governed by a world government and people in other countries? Would you want to pay taxes to a world government and give more support to people in other countries? People complain about taxes as it is... Would you want our education system governed by people in other countries?

I just can't see this working. Would we give up ALL rights as a sovereign nation to be completely under the thumb of a World Government? Given the lack of technology in so many parts of the world, how would elections take place? How would anything get voted on?

Nope, I am against this.

Answer 9

Those that promote a One World Government haven't got a clue about human nature or psychology. It would also have to be a one world race, religion, resource reserve, and culture. Each of those aspects unique to the psychology of Homo Sapien has been the cause of great wars... But it sure seems like a good idea huh? And we just HAVE to do SOMETHING.... Right???

Answer 10

Many people will consider one-world-government to be bad because of the biblical prophesies. I don't, but I add that here to make this answer complete.

I am not in favor of one-world-government because simply put, they would be able to infringe on the nations' rights. I remember hearing about, for example, the U.N. wanting to ban handguns everywhere. Now, I don't know if it is true or not, but if it is, then they would be infringing on our Constitution's second amendment.

Answer 11

You phrase the question as if its inevitable that theer wil be a world Govt.

But there never will be. Which politician will want to lose out on his/her gravy train by making decisions which would adversely affect his/her home area in favour of doing *good* somewhere else.

Not that politicians (liars & shysters) go good anyway.

We need rule based on logic & reason, not politics !!!