er be legally allowed and proceed in court, even though the parties counterclaiming are stating that they have not been served? Help!!! I attempted to gain justice for some property demolished by a city in georgia, and which they then sold at a tax sale without notifying me. In an attempt to serve them, the attorney for the city was served instead of the city manager. They then said after a year when the case came up in court that they weren't served. The court took their side, but allowed the interpleader that they filed as a cross claim. The court awarded about 15% of the overage that the city claimed was left after the tax sale to the city for attorneys fees. How is any of this legal? Help!!! To beat it all the city after filing the interpleader were the only ones to get any money from the court. Me, whose case was dismissed, still has not recieved any interpleaded funds. The City got it's check from the court Dec. 11 of last year. How can this be handled on appeal. Help
2007-02-16
03:17:31
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Martha S
2